Template:Did you know nominations/The Silence (song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 04:23, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

The Silence (song)[edit]

Alexandra Burke

  • ... that the inspiration for Alexandra Burke's (pictured) song "The Silence" came from how Burke's Aunt was experiencing relationship troubles; that she and her partner were not discussing how they felt, and thus let the silence do the talking.

Created/expanded by Calvin999 (talk), Calvin999 (talk). Nominated by Calvin999 (talk) at 18:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Hook's too long, tagged as under construction. Needs to be fixed before the review can continue. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Also, article is not even a 2x expansion yet. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
  • I've to revise for an exam today and do my exam tomorrow afternoon, so the only time I can do this will either be late tomorrow night or on thursday morning. How many characters was it before, how many now, and how many does it need to be? Aaron You Da One 10:44, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
  • It was at 3321 characters, so you need close to 3x what you have now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:32, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
  • I am finished copy editing the article, and there is nothing else I can add. There wasn't a lot of info about this song anyway so I've made the most of what I've got. If it's still too short, then I can't expand it any more. Aaron You Da One 15:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
  • The DYK check tool states: "Article has not been created or expanded 5x within the past 10 days". 5x expansion is required for DYK. A lack of information on the song is not DYK's problem, it's yours. — Statυs (talk) 21:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
    What???? I'm not saying it's anyones problem Status, I said that if it is still not 5x expanded, then I can't add anymore info. I am simply notifying the reviewer that there is no other info I can expand with to make it 5x. I don't know how to check how much an article has expanded by. You're getting on the wrong side of me now which how you are talking to me. Aaron You Da One 22:03, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
    I, of course, may be wrong, but that's just how I took your response to it not being 5x expanded. here you go, or you can just go back to before you began expanding it and times the page size by 5. — Statυs (talk) 22:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
    Yes you were wrong. I don't see how you can interpret it like that at all. It was pointless to comment here really. Aaron You Da One 22:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
    I apologize for misunderstanding your statement. That's just how I read it, so I don't really see how it could be deemed "pointless", just a misunderstanding. You clarified it for me. — Statυs (talk) 22:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
    It's how you said it, saying it's my problem etc. I just don't think the commented was needed here. Aaron You Da One 22:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
    Let me just expand my thought, so you don't mistake what I'm saying as being rude to you. The comment before yours talks about how it has not been expanded 5x, while you responded saying you could not get any more info for it. I read that as an excuse, so thus my response: "A lack of information on the song is not DYK's problem, it's yours." — Statυs (talk) 22:27, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
    It's not an excuse. I was simply notifying the reviewer that if it is still not 5x expanded, then I can't expand it any more with other information as there isn't anyway. In essence, if it's not 5x expanded, reject the hook. Aaron You Da One 22:36, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
  • (edit conflict) That's certainly how I took it when I saw your original post. Appreciate you letting us know that there wasn't a way to reasonably expand the article; another writer did the same thing in another nomination when she realized she'd have to expand another 9000 characters beyond the 6500 already written. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry Calvin/Aaron, this is not even a 3x expansion. May be a valid GA nomination though. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:57, 1 June 2012 (UTC)