Template:Did you know nominations/Two Hundred Rabbits
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 05:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Two Hundred Rabbits, Lonzo Anderson
- ... that a dream from reading a French folk tale inspired Lonzo Anderson to write Two Hundred Rabbits? Source: P.T. (1968-03-16). "Couple Writes Child's Book About Rabbits". The Courier-News. Bridgewater, New Jersey. p. 14. Retrieved 2023-04-08 – via Newspapers.com.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/El Monte Legion Stadium
- Comment: WP:DYK#Date requests: Tie-in to Easter Sunday (or for those in select territories, Easter Monday).Maybe if we can save it for next year, now that the relevant occasion has already passed us by?
Created by Slgrandson (talk). Self-nominated at 01:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Two Hundred Rabbits; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- I'll review this one.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Both articles are well expanded and fairly sourced. Long and new enough as well. Now the hook begins with ...that a dream from reading a French folk tale inspired.
- Isn't from meant to say after? Then the hook (with my adaption) is cited but only included in the article about the book and not the author. Is it possible to include a phrase about his inspiration on the dream? Thank you for the answers and also creating two interesting to read articles.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that as a youth, Lonzo Anderson "grew up rather like a rabbit" while unsupervised outdoors, anticipating his work on Two Hundred Rabbits in 1968? Source: Smaridge, Norah (1977). "Adrienne Adams and Lonzo Anderson". Famous Literary Teams for Young People. Dodd, Mead and Company. pp. 92–93. ISBN 0-396-07407-3. Retrieved 2023-04-06 – via Archive.org. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 22:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
QPQ: 
- ?
Overall: 
Articles are new and long enough. Fairly sourced though I assume AGF on the ones I didn't access. Hook Alt1 appears in both articles. Good to go, if the QPQ issue is solved. Do you need a QPQ (to review a DYK as well) or not? If you have nominated less than five articles yet, you do not need a QPQ.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Slgrandson: Can you answer the reviewer's query regarding QPQ? BorgQueen (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- @BorgQueen:/@Paradise Chronicle: As mentioned days ago on my talk page, my DYK count is at least 14 (per User:Slgrandson/Article accolades). --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 14:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Slgrandson: you're required to provide a QPQ then. BorgQueen (talk) 14:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- @BorgQueen:/@Paradise Chronicle: As mentioned days ago on my talk page, my DYK count is at least 14 (per User:Slgrandson/Article accolades). --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 14:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
No QPQ for more than three weeks since the nomination. The nominator hasn't provided any rationale for this delay, although they're aware that they need to provide a QPQ. BorgQueen (talk) 05:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- Sent in the QPQ already; see above. Apologies, but loads of burnout brought on by recent wiki duties (both here and on Miraheze), and offline babysitting + geofictional/QGIS commitments, have sent me rather back and raised my reluctance a bit. Now that I know what's expected of my DYK duties next time around...
- Besides, I'm still beginning to warm back up to WP, so... --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 11:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Don't worry, Slgrandson we have patience. A QPQ is a review of another DYK nomination. For this, you need to read an article nominated for DYK, then check if if the article is well sourced, hook is sourced, article is long enough, new enough etc. If you need any more help with this, let me know.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Slgrandson: Still needs a QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: They have provided one already. BorgQueen (talk) 06:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies, I somehow missed that. Are there any remaining issues? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- You'll have to ask @Paradise Chronicle:, who was reviewing this nom. BorgQueen (talk) 06:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies, I somehow missed that. Are there any remaining issues? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: They have provided one already. BorgQueen (talk) 06:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay as well. All good
for Alt1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paradise Chronicle (talk • contribs) 06:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay as well. All good
