Template:Did you know nominations/Typhoon June (1984)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Typhoon June (1984)
[edit]- ... that Typhoon June killed 121 people in the Philippines? Source: NDCC
ALT1:... that Typhoon June injured 26 people in the Philippines...?Source: NDCC
- Reviewed: Pioneer Square station
Created/expanded by Yellow Evan (talk). Self-nominated at 06:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC).
- The article was created May 25, and nominated May 30, so this is new enough. At more than 7000 characters of prose, this far exceeds the long enough criteria. The article is written from a neutral standpoint, and uses inline citations throughout all paragraphs. I detected no copying, close paraphrasing, or other copyvio issues, and neither did Earwig's tool. QPQ done. No image to talk about. The first hook is more interesting than the the ALT1 hook, so that is the hook I am reviewing and hope to see approved.
However, there is a problem with this hook, in that while it appears within the article, it only appears within the lead and the infobox. It does not appear within the article body, and most importantly, nowhere is this tied to a citation.78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- - yes, I missed this. Hook is fine as written, it is directly cited, and the source verifies the claim. This is ready for and deserving of mainspace exposure. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- The article was created May 25, and nominated May 30, so this is new enough. At more than 7000 characters of prose, this far exceeds the long enough criteria. The article is written from a neutral standpoint, and uses inline citations throughout all paragraphs. I detected no copying, close paraphrasing, or other copyvio issues, and neither did Earwig's tool. QPQ done. No image to talk about. The first hook is more interesting than the the ALT1 hook, so that is the hook I am reviewing and hope to see approved.