Template:Did you know nominations/Who’s Bigger: Where Historical Figures Really Rank
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Who's Bigger: Where Historical Figures Really Rank
[edit]- ... that Who's Bigger: Where Historical Figures Really Rank by Steven Skiena and Charles Ward uses metadata from the English Wikipedia to rank all persons in order of significance?
- Reviewed: Thermal Man
- Comment: I think that the following hook is also quite interesting, and meets all criteria (although there are possible quibbles), so if people want to go with that instead that's OK too: ALT1
... that Who's Bigger: Where Historical Figures Really Rank author Steven Skiena found that women needed to average the equivalent of 4 IQ points more than men to get an article in the English Wikipedia?
Created/expanded by Herostratus (talk). Self nominated at 02:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC).
This article is new enough and long enough. I prefer the original hook as I misunderstood the meaning of ALT1 until I read the article. QPQ done, neutrality OK and no close paraphrasing issues identified. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
