Template:Did you know nominations/Wildlife of Mozambique

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 09:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Wildlife of Mozambique, Lumnitzera racemosa, Xylocarpus granatum

Cannonball mangrove
Cannonball mangrove

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:23, 15 July 2019 (UTC).

  • In the Wildlife of Mozambique article, the third paragraph of the "Geography" section requires citation, and some entries in the "National parks" and "National reserves" subsections are uncited. Aoba47 (talk) 16:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
@Aoba47: Thanks! I have added the missing citations. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for adding the citations. I believe that everything is addressed now. Date, length, hook, age, and everything else checks out. Aoba47 (talk) 19:44, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Apologies for missing that. I am not that experienced with doing DYK reviews, and I will do better with future ones. Aoba47 (talk) 23:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Restoring tick per Aoba47's review. Yoninah (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Unfortunately given the amount copied from other articles the Wildlife of Mozambique article is well short of the expansion requirements. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Good take. I reckon the article was 211 characters before I started expanding it, and 1800 after I had copied the text, which gives 1589 characters as a starting point. It needs to be 7945 characters for a five-fold expansion and is currently 6758 characters. The text I copied from Protected areas of Mozambique doesn't count. Do I want to add another 1200 characters? I'm thinking about it. Do you agree my figures? @Nikkimaria: Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
1800 would be the starting point - the content that was originally here plus the content you copied in. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I guess you are correct. I would like to suggest this nomination goes ahead with the approved hook as a two article hook, but with the article Wildlife of Mozambique linked but unbolded, like this