Template:Did you know nominations/William de Greystoke, 2nd Baron Greystoke

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 03:35, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

William de Greystoke, 2nd Baron Greystoke[edit]

(

)

... that William de Greystoke was given permission to crenellate "his dwelling place" in October 1353, which would later become known as Greystoke Castle?

Created by AnonNep (talk). Nominated by Tentinator (talk) at 23:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC).

WP:VAGUE in the article: "...he was probably involved", "He may also have been part of...", "He may also have been responsible for..." And for what it's worth, half of the references are Subscription required, but not noted therein. — Maile (talk) 13:39, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

. New article created on 19 December, long enough, well cited throughout, copyvio check finds none. Hook is interesting and cited to Oxford Dictionary of National Biography online edition. The concern about "vagueness" has been addressed, but of course there is always some uncertainty in reliable sources on any medieval subject. Ready to go. Moonraker (talk) 20:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)