The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 11:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Doing... Yes, I'll review. Most probably I saw this article in GAN (or somehow already read it). Anyway... --Tito☸Dutta 05:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld has done lots of works here. --Tito☸Dutta 11:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I rather stubbornly stated that I refused to no longer be credited for DYK. I really don't care about the credit and I still feel the same way, but I agree it does seem silly me writing most of the article and not being credited for DYKs like this that they choose to nominate. I stated that I would never contribute to DYK again and I meant it. But I'm still happy to work with Nvv and Rosie and if they nominate something they happen to edit then I may as well be also credited, but I still refuse to have anything to do with the process and will not be encouraging the others to churn out lots of DYKs as before. I want to focus on GAs mostly nowadays, but it becomes boring to solely do that and I'm happy to continue to work with them on start class articles; if they're still keen on nominating the articles then I'm not going to stop them.
ALT1: ... that the 1930 aviation WWI film Young Eagles was intended to replicate the success of the 1927 Academy Award winner Wings and featured footage of it in the film? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:59, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I am happy with the above note (in view of our 6 years of collaboration) and I have now rightly included Dr. Blofeld in the credits.--Nvvchar. 01:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Good to go. --Tito☸Dutta 13:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)