Template talk:Pp-office

This template was considered for deletion on 5 February 2023. The result of the discussion was "keep".

Template:Pp-office is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Capitalization in wikilink

Please change the one instance of [[Wikipedia:Office Actions|Wikimedia Foundation Office]] to [[Wikipedia:Office actions|Wikimedia Foundation Office]]. Thank you. ~ PseudoSudo 00:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I think. – Luna Santin (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

`{{editprotected}}`

Can the documentation be moved to a /doc subpage, so the only thing protected is the actual "includeonly" template? 68.39.174.238 23:37, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. All of the protection template pages have been standardized. If there's an actual reason to change the template, then feel free to re-enable the editprotected tag. Cheers. --MZMcBride 00:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done The documentation has been moved to the /doc subpage. Brian Jason Drake 11:27, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pp-meta

{{editprotected}} This template should use {{pp-meta}}. Code:

<noinclude>{{pp-template|small=yes}}
</noinclude>{{pp-meta
| image = [[Image:Padlock-black.svg|40px| ]]
| text = This page is currently under the scrutiny of the '''[[Wikipedia:Office actions|Wikimedia Foundation Office]]''' and is protected. If you are able to edit this page, please discuss all changes and additions on the [[{{TALKSPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]] first. '''Do not remove protection from this article unless you are authorized by the Wikimedia Foundation to do so.'''
}}<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{{category|}}}|none|<!--THEN-->|[[Category:Office protected|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}</includeonly><noinclude>
----

Thanks. —Ms2ger (talk) 18:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sandstein (talk) 07:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sync with sandbox

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hi. Please sync template:pp-office with special:permalink/555063264. This adds the ability to specify how long the page has been protected. I've tested the code and it seems to work well. Thanks! --MZMcBride (talk) 15:14, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Redrose64 (talk) 19:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance of adding the same ability to Template:pp-office-dmca ? --Geniac (talk) 03:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 25 August 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change:

|small={{{small|}}}
|demospace={{{demospace|}}}

To:

|small={{{small|}}}
|right={{{right|}}}
|demospace={{{demospace|}}}

This allows use of the new pp-meta parameter. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Redrose64 (talk) 21:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to convert this template to Lua

There is currently a proposal to convert this and other protection templates to Lua at Module talk:Protection banner#Proposal to convert all protection templates to use this module. Please join this discussion over there if you are interested. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 23:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should this page be unprotected?

This page appears to have no transclusions, should the page be lowered to semi or extended confirmed, for example? Toadette ^{(Happy Thanksgiving!)} 16:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link to WP:BLACKLOCK instead of WP:FULL

Clicking on the black lock takes users to the section on full protection instead of the section on office actions. Weird. Maybe a template editor should change that? Toadspike [Talk] 09:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]