This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Don't touch it! We had a huge meltdown today – ANI, Move Requests, full page protection, articles transcluding themselves; the whole shebang. But it's stable and working right now. The conversation is going on at Talk:CJK Unified Ideographs Extension C as to how we're going to proceed. Once we've figured out how to do this, we'll sort out Extensions A and D and any other blocks that need attention. VanIsaacWSVexcontribs05:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
VanIsaac, what else could there possibly be to "figure out"? We know what needs to be done; you seem to be very hesitant to let any necessary changes occur. — |J~Pæst|06:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know what needs to be done. We need to preserve attribution and not break things. Your edits today have worked against this. We have an admin who has agreed to help us with this stuff - some of these need admin moves because we are moving against a redirect - but if you keep editing without getting agreement, you will continue to break things, and continue to lose attributions. This is just plain bad. I know that you think you are just doing what should be done, but things keep getting screwed up because all three of us, DePiep, you, and me, are trying to fix the problem ourselves. VanIsaacWSVexcontribs07:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This page, based on the consistent format of literally every single other Unicode chart template, should be a redirect to the page for the actual template: Template:Unicode chart CJK Unified Ideographs Extension C. All Unicode charts absolutely MUST begin their titles with "Template:Unicode chart", and there certainly cannot be duplicates of the exact same template. There is no reason whatsoever to use this page for a Unicode chart, as this would break the consistency of all Unicode charts on Wikipedia (see Category:Unicode charts). Instead—like the other redirects to Unicode charts from shortened versions of the charts' titles (e.g. omitting the words "Unicode chart")—this should redirect to the chart itself, not illogically include it. — |J~Pæst|06:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
