Thalassocnus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Thalassocnus
Temporal range: Late Miocene-Late Pliocene (Huayquerian-Uquian)
~7.246–2.588 Ma
Thalassocnus.jpg
Thalassocnus skeleton in its hypothetical swimming pose, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Subclass: Theria
Infraclass: Eutheria
Superorder: Xenarthra
Order: Pilosa
Family: Megatheriidae
Subfamily: Thalassocninae
Genus: Thalassocnus
de Muizon & McDonald, 1995
Species
  • T. antiquus
  • T. natans
  • T. littoralis
  • T. carolomartini
  • T. yaucensis

Thalassocnus is an extinct genus of apparently semiaquatic (for the geologically oldest species) or fully aquatic (for the geologically most recent species) marine sloth from the Miocene and Pliocene of South America. Fossils found to date have been from the coast of Peru (Pisco Formation) and Chile (Bahía Inglesa Formation).[1][2] They were apparently grazers of sea grass and seaweed. The various species of this genus provides the best-documented case of gradual adaptation to a secondarily aquatic lifestyle. This is documented both at the morphological level, such as a progressive flattening of the radius,[3] and at the microanatomical level, which shows a progressive increase in thickness (pachyostosis) and compactness (osteosclerosis) of the long limb bones and ribs,[4] providing ballast. They may have used their powerful claws to anchor themselves to the sea floor to facilitate feeding, similar to the behavior of the marine iguana.[3]

Description[edit]

Thalassocnus were semi-marine sloths that grew to be slightly larger than the average human. The first finding of a Thalassocnus fossil was in Peru, at the Pisco Formation site. It was also here where the different species of Thalassocnus were identified. As time passed, a gradual thickening of the cortical bone was found in the ribs and limbs of Thalassocnus; an increase in density that helped to counteract the natural buoyancy of an air-breathing mammal. Later species also displayed elongation of the premaxillae and mandible symphysis, creating a long and wide snout, better adapted to consuming water plants. The earlier species of Thalassocnus have numerous striae on their teeth, possibly indicating intake of sand when feeding in shallow water. Later species such as T. carolomartini and T. yaucensis, were apparently specialized grazers that fed in deeper water; they display distinct evidence of transverse mandibular movement and lack dental striae.[3]

Taxonomy[edit]


Megatheriidae

Hapalops


Nothrotheriidae
Nothrotheriinae

Nothrotherium



Nothrotheriops



Thalassocninae

T. antiquus




T. natans




T. littoralis




T. carolomartini



T. yaucensis








Presumed phylogeny of Thalassocnus, with relationship to several nothrotheriines and a megatheriid.[4] However, a later phylogenetic study conducted by Amson, de Muizon & Gaudin (2017) indicated that Thalassocnus was not a nothrotheriid but rather a member of the family Megatheriidae.[5]

Paleobiology[edit]

Closeup of Thalassocnus skull, Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Paris

Nutrition[edit]

Thalassocnus were herbivores, as evidenced from both osteological findings and coprolite findings from the related extinct terrestrial sloth Nothrotheriops. The tooth structure of the three early Thalassocnus species, T. antiquus, T. natans, and T. littoralis, is very similar to the type seen in Megatheria, with the molars being of the bilophodont type. This indicates that Megatheria and early thalassocninae had similar diets. Nothrotheriops are closely related to Thalassocnine. Their diet is known to have been herbivorous, as found from their faeces, preserved in the form of coprolites [I]. The foraging behaviour of the older representatives are thought to have involved the gathering of sea grasses and seaweed from shallow coastal waters, whose depth was less than one meter. Because of the plentiful striae on their teeth, the species possibly ingested sand along with their food. The younger species, T. carolomartini and T. yaucensis, do not possess these signs of sand-induced wear on the teeth. This corresponds with osteological findings, which indicate that these younger representatives were better adapted to aquatic life than their predecessors. They possibly foraged in deeper waters, in a similar manner to today's manatees. Further changes to the skull structure as the species developed also show a change in adaptation to different food sources in the younger species, from terrestrial to aquatic.

Movement and adaptation to aquatic life[edit]

Cross sections of rib, femur and tibia of different species of Thalassocnus compared to Choloepus showing the progressive adaption for aquatic life

Thalassocnine possessed adaptations to aquatic life, analogues of which can be found in many vertebrates that adapted to a return to living in the sea. One such adaptation is increased bone density. Heavier bones help lower buoyancy and thus conserve energy. The bones of Thalassocnus species are heavier than other mammals’, supporting their return to the water. The younger species show increasingly adapted bone structure; the younger species show decreasing medullary lumen diameter, with T. carolomartini almost completely losing the medulla in its bones [3]. Thalassocnine also possessed longer shinbones than their terrestrial relatives. This modification, along with strong forelimbs, must have allowed them to propel themselves with a paddling movement. Their spines also saw significant modifications. Relatively small vertebrae are found behind the head, not allowing for strong muscles to hold the head. In the water the buoyancy combats gravity already, and therefore in an aquatic lifestyle strong neck muscles are unneeded for this purpose. Even though the structure of the tail vertebrae hint at strong musculature, this is not necessarily evidence that Thalassocnine used their tails to swim. This pattern is also seen in tree-dwelling animals with strong prehensile tails. [II]

Extinction[edit]

Thalassocnus went extinct in the late Pliocene. This period was characterised by a higher temperature than today, as well as a higher sea level (see also: Pliocene). However, when the Isthmus of Panama formed, the coastal water of Peru cooled down. Thalassocnus might not have had the chance to adapt to this changing environment, since the change in climate also caused the extinction of sea-grasses and seaweeds in the area.

Distribution and habitat[edit]

Thalassocnus lived during an 8 million year period, lasting from the early Late Miocene throughout the end of the Pliocene (11 to 2.5 Ma).[6] The oldest species of Thalassocnus is T. antiquus, the most recent species is T. carolomartini.[7]

All Thalassocnus fossils found to date were found on the Pacific coast of South-America, generally in the same layers as whales, dolphins and seabirds.[8] Most Thalassocnus fossils have been found in Peru, especially in the Pisco Formation. Another site of interest is the Bahía Inglesa Formation in Chile, where the first non-Pisco Thalassocnus fossil was found. Finding this fossil showed that the distribution area of Thalassocnus was 1600 km larger than originally thought. The Chilean fossil more closely resembled the older Thalassocnus species, T. antiquus and T. natans, than the more recent species.[9]

Thalassocnus is described as having aquatic- or semiaquatic habits. Since the middle of the Miocene, what is now the coast of Peru has been mostly desert. Thalassocnus would live on land, but because of the lack of terrestrial plants, find its food in the ocean. Its diet most likely consisted of seaweeds and seagrasses.[6] Changes in bone structure suggest that Thalassocnus used to live in a terrestrial habit and then slowly adapted to an aquatic one. For example, osteosclerosis found in Thalassocnus fossils seems to implicate that Thalassocnus not only swam, but walked as well.[10] This trait would originate in the ancestors of Thalassocnus, the Megatheriidae, who lived on land. Further support for Thalassocnus having an aquatic habit comes from its limb bone proportions. The difference between the limb bone proportions of Thalassocnus and terrestrial sloths is significantly larger than the difference between the limb bone proportions of terrestrial and aquatic rodents. This indicates that, just like rodents, there were both terrestrial sloths and aquatic ones (Thalassocnus).[6]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Thalassocnus at Fossilworks.org
  2. ^ Canto, J.; Salas-Gismondi, R.; Cozzuol, M.; Yáñez, J. (September 2008). "The aquatic sloth Thalassocnus (Mammalia, Xenarthra) from the late Miocene of North-Central Chile: biogeographic and ecological implications". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 28 (3): 918–922. ISSN 0272-4634. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[918:TASTMX]2.0.CO;2. 
  3. ^ a b c Muizon, C. de; McDonald, H. G.; Salas, R.; Urbina, M. (June 2004). "The evolution of feeding adaptations of the aquatic sloth Thalassocnus". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 24 (2): 398–410. JSTOR 4524727. doi:10.1671/2429b. 
  4. ^ a b Amson, E.; Muizon, C. de; Laurin, M.; Argot, C.; Buffrénil, V. de (2014). "Gradual adaptation of bone structure to aquatic lifestyle in extinct sloths from Peru". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Royal Society of London. 281 (1782): 1–6. PMC 3973278Freely accessible. PMID 24621950. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0192. 
  5. ^ Eli Amson; Christian de Muizon; Timothy J. Gaudin (2017). "A reappraisal of the phylogeny of the Megatheria (Mammalia: Tardigrada), with an emphasis on the relationships of the Thalassocninae, the marine sloths". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 179 (1): 217–236. doi:10.1111/zoj.12450. 
  6. ^ a b c Muizon, C. de; McDonald, H. G. (1995). "An aquatic sloth from the Pliocene of Peru". Nature. 375: 224–227. Bibcode:1995Natur.375..224M. doi:10.1038/375224a0. 
  7. ^ Muizon, C. de; McDonald, H. G.; Salas, R.; Urbina, M. (2003). "A new early species of the aquatic sloth Thalassocnus (Mammalia, Xenarthra) from the late Miocene of Peru". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 23: 886–894. doi:10.1671/2361-13. 
  8. ^ Bianucci, G.; Di Celma, C.; Landini, W. (2015). "Distribution of fossil marine vertebrates in Cerro Colorado, the type locality of the giant raptorial sperm whale Livyatan melvillei (Miocene, Pisco Formation, Peru)". Journal of Maps. 12 (3): 543–557. doi:10.1080/17445647.2015.1048315. 
  9. ^ Canto, J.; Salas-Gismondi, R.; Cozzuol, M.; Yáñez, J. (2008). "The aquatic sloth Thalassocnus (Mammalia, Xenarthra) from the late Miocene of North-Central Chile: biogeographic and ecological implications". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 28 (3): 918–922. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[918:TASTMX]2.0.CO;2. 
  10. ^ Amson, E.; Muizon, C. de; Laurin, M.; Argot, C.; Buffrénil, V. de (2014). "Gradual adaptation of bone structure to aquatic lifestyle in extinct sloths from Peru". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281 (1782): 1–6. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0192

Bibliography[edit]

  • World Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs & Prehistoric Creatures: The Ultimate Visual Reference To 1000 Dinosaurs And Prehistoric Creatures Of Land, Air And Sea ... And Cretaceous Eras (World Encyclopedia) by Dougal Dixon