Totem and Taboo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Totem and Taboo
Freud Totem und Tabu 1913.jpg
Cover of the first edition
Author Sigmund Freud
Original title Totem und Tabu: Einige Übereinstimmungen im Seelenleben der Wilden und der Neurotiker
Translator Abraham Brill
James Strachey
Language German
Subject Totemism
Publisher Beacon Press
Publication date
1913
Media type Print
Totem and Taboo
Click to open full book (English)

Totem and Taboo: Resemblances Between the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics, or Totem and Taboo: Some Points of Agreement between the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics, (German: Totem und Tabu: Einige Übereinstimmungen im Seelenleben der Wilden und der Neurotiker) is a 1913 book by Sigmund Freud, in which Freud applies psychoanalysis to the fields of archaeology, anthropology, and the study of religion. It is a collection of four essays inspired by the work of Wilhelm Wundt and Carl Jung and first published in the journal Imago (1912–13): "The Horror of Incest", "Taboo and Emotional Ambivalence", "Animism, Magic and the Omnipotence of Thoughts", and "The Return of Totemism in Childhood". Though Totem and Taboo has been seen as one of the classics of anthropology, comparable to Edward Burnett Tylor's Primitive Culture (1871) and Sir James George Frazer's The Golden Bough (1890), the work is now regarded as discredited by anthropologists. Cultural anthropologist Alfred L. Kroeber was an early critic of Totem and Taboo, publishing a critique of the work in 1920. Some authors have seen redeeming value in the work.

Background[edit]

Freud, who had a longstanding interest in social anthropology and was devoted to the study of archaeology and prehistory, wrote that the work of Wilhelm Wundt and Carl Jung provided him with his "first stimulus" to write the essays included in Totem and Taboo. The work was translated twice into English, first by Abraham Brill and later by James Strachey.[1]

Summary[edit]

Chapter 1[edit]

"The Horror of Incest" concerns incest taboos adopted by societies believing in totemism.

Freud examines the system of Totemism among the Australian Aborigines. Every clan has a totem (usually an animal, sometimes a plant or force of nature) and people are not allowed to marry those with the same totem as themselves. Freud examines this practice as preventing against incest. The totem is passed down hereditarily, either through the father or the mother. The relationship of father is also not just his father, but every man in the clan that, hypothetically, could have been his father. He relates this to the idea of young children calling all of their parents' friends as aunts and uncles. There are also further marriage classes, sometimes as many as eight, that group the totems together, and therefore limit a man's choice of partners. He also talks about the widespread practices amongst the cultures of the Pacific Islands and Africa of avoidance. Many cultures do not allow brothers and sisters to interact in any way, generally after puberty. Men are not allowed to be alone with their mothers-in-law or say each other's names. He explains this by saying that after a certain age parents often live through their children to endure their marriage and that mothers-in-law may become overly attached to their son-in-law. Similar restrictions exist between a father and daughter, but they only exist from puberty until engagement.

Chapter 2[edit]

In "Taboo and emotional ambivalence," Freud considers the relationship of taboos to totemism. Freud uses his concepts projection and ambivalence he developed during his work with neurotic patients in Vienna to discuss the relationship between taboo and totemism.

Like neurotics, 'primitive' people feel ambivalent about most people in their lives, but will not admit this consciously to themselves. They will not admit that as much as they love their mother, there are things about her they hate. The suppressed part of this ambivalence (the hate parts) are projected onto others. In the case of natives, the hateful parts are projected onto the totem. As in: 'I did not want my mother to die, the totem wanted her to die.'

Freud expands this idea of ambivalence to include the relationship of citizens to their ruler. In ceremonies surrounding kings, which are often quite violent, – such as the king starving himself in the woods for a few weeks – he considers two levels that are functioning to be the "ostensible" (i.e., the king is being honored) and the "actual" (i.e., the king is being tortured). He uses examples to illustrate the taboos on rulers. He says the kings of Ireland were subject to restrictions such as not being able to go to certain towns or on certain days of the week.[2]

Chapter 3[edit]

In "Animism, Magic and the Omnipotence of Thought," Freud examines the animism and narcissistic phase associated with a primitive understanding of the universe and early libidinal development. A belief in magic and sorcery derives from an overvaluation of psychical acts whereby the structural conditions of mind are transposed onto the world: this overvaluation survives in both primitive men and neurotics. The animistic mode of thinking is governed by an "omnipotence of thoughts", a projection of inner mental life onto the external world. This imaginary construction of reality is also discernible in obsessive thinking, delusional disorders and phobias. Freud comments that the omnipotence of thoughts has been retained in the magical realm of art. The last part of the essay concludes the relationship between magic (paranormal), superstition and taboo, arguing that the practices of animism are merely a cover up of instinctual repression (Freud).

Chapter 4[edit]

In "The Return of Totemism in Childhood," Freud combines one of Charles Darwin's more speculative theories about the arrangements of early human societies (a single alpha-male surrounded by a harem of females, similar to the arrangement of gorilla groupings) with the theory of the sacrifice ritual taken from William Robertson Smith to conclude that the origins of totemism lie in a singular event, when a band of prehistoric brothers expelled from the alpha-male group returned to kill their father, whom they both feared and respected. In this respect, Freud located the beginnings of the Oedipus complex at the origins of human society, and postulated that all religion was in effect an extended and collective form of guilt and ambivalence to cope with the killing of the father figure (which he saw as the true original sin).

Reception[edit]

1913–1949[edit]

Carl Furtmüller, a former member of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society, reviewed Totem and Taboo in 1914. Furtmüller wrote that Freud ignored critics and misused the work of Darwin. In Furtmüller's view, while Freud showed wit and astuteness, he also employed "the free play of fantasy" in place of logic. Furtmüller compared the Oedipus complex to the "original sin of the human race."[3] Totem and Taboo became widely known in the United States by the end of World War I. According to Annemarie De Waal Malefijt, the work produced "angry reactions" from anthropologists, even on the basis of its subtitle alone.[4] Anthropologist critics of Totem and Taboo included Alfred L. Kroeber, who in 1920 reviewed its English translation in American Anthropologist, describing Freud as a "gallant and stimulating adventurer into ethnology", but rejecting the idea that Freud's theories could explain social origins and evolutionary phases,[5] Franz Boas, who considered Freud's method in Totem and Taboo one-sided and useless for advancing understanding of cultural development,[4] and Robert Ranulph Marett, who referred to the work as a "just-so story".[6]

Psychoanalyst and anthropologist Géza Róheim considered Totem and Taboo one of the great landmarks in the history of anthropology, comparable only to Edward Burnett Tylor's Primitive Culture (1871) and Sir James George Frazer's The Golden Bough (1890), describing it as an "epoch-making work" in both anthropology and the social sciences generally. Róheim eventually abandoned the assumptions of Totem and Taboo, but continued to regard it as a classic, the work that created psychoanalytic anthropology. Psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich, following Johann Jakob Bachofen and other authors, maintained that early human societies were matriarchies and that this ruled out Freud's account of the origins of civilization in Totem and Taboo. Reich argued that Freud's theory that the Oedipus complex was a prime factor in the development of civilization ignored the cultural relativity of the Oedipus complex, which, drawing on the work of Bronisław Malinowski, he saw as only a result of the patriarchal order.[7] Freud himself considered "The Return of Totemism in Childhood" his best-written work, and Totem and Taboo as a whole remained one of his favorite works. Novelist Thomas Mann wrote that Totem and Taboo had made a stronger impression on him than any of Freud's other works, and that of all Freud's works it had the greatest artistic merit.[8] Anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss criticized the work in his The Elementary Structures of Kinship (1948).[9] Feminist Simone de Beauvoir criticized it in The Second Sex (1949), writing that Freud is forced to "invent strange fictions" to explain the passage from "the individual to the society"; she saw the inability to explain this transition as a failing of psychoanalysis.[10]

1950–present[edit]

Kroeber published a reassessment of Totem and Taboo in 1952.[11] Author Georges Bataille argued that Freud was misled by the "superficial knowledge of ethnographical data" typical of his time, and now superseded, into concluding in Totem and Taboo that the taboo on touching corpses "generally countered the desire to touch" them.[12] Classicist Norman O. Brown criticized the work in Life Against Death (1959), writing that in it Freud correlates psycho-sexual stages of development with stages of history, thereby seeing history as a "process of growing up". Brown saw this view as a "residue of eighteenth-century optimism and rationalism", and found it inadequate as both history and psychoanalysis.[13] Anthropologist Marvin Harris described Totem and Taboo as representative of what Boas' followers regarded as "the worst form of evolutionary speculation", criticizing "the grandiosity of its compass, the flimsiness of its evidence ... the generality of its conclusions" and its "anachronistic framework". In his view, nothing about the work prepared "orthodox Freudians" to deal with the variety of culturally determined personality structures revealed by the work of Malinowski, Margaret Mead, and Ruth Benedict.[14]

Anthropologist Peter Farb wrote that Totem and Taboo "demonstrates the lengths to which a theorist will go to find an explanation" for totemism, adding that despite their disagreements on other issues, anthropologists now concur that the work is "totally discredited".[15] Literary critic René Girard noted in Violence and the Sacred (1972) that despite the rejection of Totem and Taboo by "contemporary criticism", its concept of collective murder is close to the themes of his own work.[16] Historian Peter Gay, evaluating Totem and Taboo in his Freud: A Life for Our Time (1988), wrote that Freud outstrips the conjectures of Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his ingenuity. Gay observes that Totem and Taboo was in part an attempt by Freud to outdo his rival Jung, and that the work is full of evidence that "Freud's current combats reverberated with his past history, conscious and unconscious."[17] Literary critic Harold Bloom wrote in The American Religion (1992) that Totem and Taboo has no greater acceptance among anthropologists than does the Book of Mormon, and that there are parallels between the two works, such as a concern with polygamy.[18] Author Richard Schechner criticized Freud for having assumed in Totem and Taboo that some humans are more "primitive" than others.[19]

Psychologist David P. Barash writes that in Totem and Taboo Freud "combines idiosyncratic, almost crackpot fantasy with startling profundity and originality."[20] Author Anthony Elliott argued that Freud's account of social and cultural organization suffers from grave limitations, and that because of anthropological knowledge that became available subsequent to Totem and Taboo the theories Freud proposed there now have few advocates. Elliott wrote that, "Freud's attempt to anchor the Oedipus complex in a foundational event displaces his crucial insights into the radically creative power of the human imagination", ascribing to real events "what are in fact products of fantasy, the life of the mind." Elliott added that "there are still elements of considerable interest" in the work, crediting Freud with showing that "reality is not pre-given or natural", but rather structured by the social and technical frameworks fashioned by human beings, and that "individual subjectivity and society presuppose one another."[21] Author Dominique Bourdin wrote that Totem and Taboo, "develops an idea that clearly embarrasses the current psychoanalysts, but that is essential to the logic of Freudian thought: that of Phylogenetics".[22]

Philosopher Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen and psychologist Sonu Shamdasani argued that in Totem and Taboo Freud applied to history "the same method of interpretation that he used in the privacy of his office to 'reconstruct' his patients' forgotten and repressed memories."[23]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Dickson, Albert; Freud, Sigmund (1990). The Penguin Freud Library Volume 13: The Origins of Religion. Penguin Books. pp. 45, 46, 49. ISBN 0-14-013803-X. 
  2. ^ Freud, Sigmund Totem and Taboo London WW Norton 1989 page 59
  3. ^ Lieberman, E. James; Kramer, Robert (2012). The Letters of Sigmund Freud & Otto Rank: Inside Psychoanalysis. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 37–8. ISBN 978-1-4214-0354-0. 
  4. ^ a b De Waal Malefijt, Annemarie (1974). Images of Man: A History of Anthropological Thought. New York: Alfred A. Knpof. p. 295. ISBN 0-394-48330-8. 
  5. ^ Kroeber, Alfred, L. "Totem and Taboo: An Ethnologic Psychoanalysis" (Book review). JSTOR. Retrieved November 2016.  Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  6. ^ Gay, Peter (1995). Freud: A Life for Our Time. London: Papermac. p. 327. ISBN 0-333-48638-2. 
  7. ^ Robinson, Paul (1990). The Freudian Left. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. pp. 50–51, 89–90. ISBN 0-8014-9716-7. 
  8. ^ Dickson, Albert; Freud, Sigmund (1990). The Penguin Freud Library Volume 13: The Origins of Religion. Penguin Books. p. 47. ISBN 0-14-013803-X. 
  9. ^ concluding chapter of Claude Levi-Strauss, 562-563-564 pages of the edition by Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 2002, The Elementary Structures of Kinship (1949), Needham, Rodney, ed
  10. ^ Beauvoir, Simone de (2009). The Second Sex. London: Vintage Books. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-099-49938-1. 
  11. ^ Harris, Marvin (1971). The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. Thomas Y. Crowell Company. p. 431. ISBN 0-690-703228. 
  12. ^ Bataille, Georges (2001). Eroticism. London: Penguin Books. p. 47. ISBN 0-14-118410-8. 
  13. ^ Brown, Norman O. (1985). Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of Human History. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press. p. 14. ISBN 0-8195-6144-4. 
  14. ^ Harris, Marvin (1971). The Rise of Anthropological Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. Thomas Y. Crowell Company. pp. 425–6. ISBN 0-690-703228. 
  15. ^ Farb, Peter (1978). Man's Rise to Civilization: The Cultural Ascent of the Indians of North America. New York: E. P. Dutton. pp. 67–68. ISBN 0-525-15270-9. 
  16. ^ Girard, René (2005). Violence and the Sacred. New York: Continuum. p. 204. ISBN 0-8264-7718-6. 
  17. ^ Gay, Peter (1995). Freud: A Life for Our Time. London: Papermac. pp. 325–6. ISBN 0-333-48638-2. 
  18. ^ Bloom, Harold (1992). The American Religion: The Emergence of the Post-Christian Nation. New York: Simon & Schuster. pp. 106–7. ISBN 0-671-67997-X. 
  19. ^ Schechner, Richard (1994). Ingold, Tim, ed. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology: Humanity, Culture, and Social Life. London: Routledge. pp. 635–6. ISBN 0-415-16421-4. 
  20. ^ Barash, David P. (1998). Ideas of Human Nature: From the Bhagavad Gita. Prentice Hall. p. 116. ISBN 0-13-647587-6. 
  21. ^ Elliott, Anthony (2002). Psychoanalytic Theory: An Introduction. Palgrave. p. 43. ISBN 0-333-91912-2. 
  22. ^ Bourdin, Dominique (2007). La psychanalyse de Freud à aujourd'hui: Histoire, concepts, pratique. Paris: Bréal. p. 89. ISBN 978-2749507460. 
  23. ^ Borch-Jacobsen, Mikkel; Shamdasani, Sonu (2012). The Freud Files: An Inquiry into the History of Psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 179–180. ISBN 978-0-521-72978-9. 

External links[edit]