Boys' toys and games
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Boys' toys and games, as opposed to girls' toys and games, are a subset of toys and games that appeal to male children. Research suggests that this appeal may be driven by biological factors, peer pressure, parental choices, marketing, and tradition.[citation needed]
Background
[edit]Research suggests that there may be some biological predispositions at play that drive toy preferences. Kim Wallen, a psychologist at Yerkes National Primate Research Center, found in her study that male rhesus monkeys played with model dump trucks and other wheeled toys, over plush dolls.[1][non-primary source needed]
Infant boys and girls as young as 9 months old have been found to display stereotypical toy preferences, suggesting that there are biological and environmental factors which appear very early in development. A City, University of London study found that in children aged 9 to 32 months, boys preferred balls and toy cars,[2] and that the preference increased with age.[3]
In a 2018 study done by developmental psychologist Lauren Spinner,[4] the effects of images of children playing with stereotypic or counter-stereotypic toys was analyzed on kids age 4 to 7 years old. After the subjects were shown one of the images, they were asked to pick whether a boy or girl would play with a selection of toys such as a baby doll, jet fighter, tool kit, tea set, etc. Children who were shown the counter-stereotypic photos were more open to the idea of boys and girls possibly liking toys usually geared toward the opposite gender. However, seeing the photos did not change the child's own opinions about which toys they would select.[5]
Themes
[edit]Machinery and technology
[edit]Toys often introduce or reinforce interest in, machinery and technology for boys.
These toys can also often blur the lines of the man-machine dichotomy, with action figures that represent males as machines on a range from technologically enhanced humans to cyborgs to sentient robots. One product line by Revell called Beast Machines even depicted figures which had humanoid heads and torsos, but tanks from the waist down. Tomy's Z-Knights toys introduced terms related to computer technology, in effect of masculinizing them by using humanoid robot characters named like Megahertz, CPU, and Kilabyte (kilobyte). The very popular Transformers line, Power Rangers (American adaptation of Super Sentai) and related media depicted sentient robots, almost all of which were portrayed as male, which could transform into various vehicles and animals.[6]
This interaction with machinery persists into adulthood. Cultural phenomenon like car races such as NASCAR promote similar ideas of masculinity, competition, and rough play that the stereotypical boy's toy might also encourage.[7]
In entertainment and advertising
[edit]In a study done by sociologist Elizabeth Sweet, the history of toys marketed by gender was analyzed in Sears catalogs from the 20th century. In this study, advertisements published from the 1920s to the 1950s often promoted stereotypical roles of men and women to boys and girls.
During the Reagan Administration, the regulations limiting advertisers’ ability to reach children became dismantled. Shows such as My Little Pony and Transformers were created to both entertain and advertise simultaneously – a revolutionary change for the toy business. According to professor of education Diane Levin, this pattern for companies escalated so as by December 1985, 9/10 popular children's toys were associated with television shows.[8]
In 2012, sociologist Carol Auster analyzed Disney's retail website and realized toys were specifically listed as “girl” or “boy” toys. Currently, Disney cross-lists its toys under each section yet less than 23% toys appeared on both lists with the majority cross-listed colors more typically associated with boys perpetuating masculinity as the default of gender-neutral children's toys.[9]
Toys
[edit]Traditional toys for boys include:[10]
- Action figures
- Remote Control Toys
- Blaster toys
- BB guns
- Construction sets
- Model cars
- Radio controlled model cars, boats, and other vehicles
- Slingshots
- Toy robots and robot dogs
- Toy soldiers
- Toy tools
- Toy train
- Toy trucks
Games
[edit]Traditional games played by boys include:[citation needed]
References
[edit]- ^ Callaway, Ewen (4 April 2008). "Male monkeys prefer boys' toys". New Scientist. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
- ^ "Boys 'prefer cars from early on'". BBC News. 16 April 2010. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
- ^ Wigmore, George. "Infants prefer toys typed to their gender, says study". Retrieved 24 November 2017.
- ^ Spinner, Lauren; Cameron, Lindsey; Calogero, Rachel (2018). "Peer Toy Play as a Gateway to Children's Gender Flexibility: The Effect of (Counter)Stereotypic Portrayals of Peers in Children's Magazines". Sex Roles. 79 (5–6). Springer US: 314–328. doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0883-3. ISSN 1573-2762. PMC 6096659. PMID 30147223.
- ^ Klass, Perri (February 5, 2018). "Breaking Gender Stereotypes in the Toy Box". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
- ^ Varney, Wendy (2002). "Of Men and Machines: Images of Masculinity in Boys' Toys". Feminist Studies. 28 (1): 153–174. doi:10.2307/3178498. hdl:2027/spo.0499697.0028.109. ISSN 0046-3663. JSTOR 3178498.
- ^ Horowitz, Roger (Fall 1998). "Boys and Their Toys? Masculinity, Technology, and Work". International Labor and Working-Class History. 54 (54): 132–135. doi:10.1017/S0147547900006268. ISSN 0147-5479. JSTOR 27672506.
- ^ "How Today's Toys May Be Harming Your Daughter". Magazine. 2016-12-15. Archived from the original on December 17, 2016. Retrieved 2019-03-28.
- ^ "How Today's Toys May Be Harming Your Daughter". Magazine. 2016-12-15. Archived from the original on December 17, 2016. Retrieved 2019-03-28.
- ^ Sumaroka, M.; Bornstein, M. (2007). Benson, Janette B.; Haith, Marshall M. (eds.). "Play". Social and Emotional Development in Infancy and Early Childhood. Academic Press (published 2009): 293–301. ISBN 978-0-12-375065-5.