User talk:Realist2

File:Realist2.JPG

Hello, if you are here it is most likely that you want to complain about me or my edits. If you are here to send me an image of a swastika, please, just leave it on my user page, the "You have a message" icon drives me mad. Alternatively you could add your name and racist quote/rant here for my future amusement. If you are a friend, welcome to my world, how can I help you? I'm incoherent when it comes to my messaging pattern, sometimes I reply here, sometimes at your talk page or sometimes at both. I archive my talk page manually, when it reaches about 60,000 bytes and I start to burn calories while scrolling.

If you would like to see me endure a Request for Adminship please follow this link for more details. All supports or comments are welcome. Regards.

Nr9krw

I'm not playing dirty tricks im trying to improve the site!!!! Thank You!!!Nr9krw —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nr9krw (talk • contribs) 14:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Miss Janet

Hi there,

I noticed you reverted (several times) changes made to sales of Janet's "Disclipline" album. I'm wondering why as Billboard just reported on up to date sales in this week's online issue. If Billboard isn't official, then I don't know what is!

Please go to: http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/ask_bb/index.jsp and read "Janet's slip".

Thanks! PatrickJ83 (talk) 20:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I replied in my revert. — Realist² 20:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Actually, let's keep it. That billboard link won't work in a few days so ill revert then. — Realist² 20:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

RE: edits

I'm sorry. Were you also talking about other edits besides Gwen Stefani? Charmed36 (talk) 20:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll it be with Gwen Stefani's articles. They are off my watchlist now. Charmed36 (talk) 21:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Miss Janet part deux

Hello again, how are you?

Regarding your concern of the link being "irrelevant", those questions are up on a weekly basis and then archived (the archive link is the right side of the billboard page). Anyway I hope we got this sorted. PatrickJ83 (talk) 21:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

As long as the archive works that's fine by me, but if it can't be found in the archive we go back to the old figure. And yes I'm fine, I'm having a wonderful day actually :-). — Realist² 21:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Jojo, again

So, is Jojo a legit GA article? --Efe (talk) 11:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

No, I'm still gonna reassess it, I was too busy yesterday dealing with multiple sock puppets of User:Jamalar and protecting Womanizer to do anything serious. I'm busy most of today, will start looking at it tonight. — Realist² 11:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok, your call. Check your e-mail. =) --Efe (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Ty. --Efe (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

What does Ty mean? Thank you? Lol, I'm so not up with abbreviations. I only recently found out what <3 and "lmao" mean. — Realist² 14:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Ya. It means thank you. Me as well, I even have to think hard what WTF was. <3 and "lmao", hmmm, I don't know. hehe. --Efe (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll check it later. --Efe (talk) 03:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Your message

Jamalar's IPs are 1) 86.25.51.x to 86.25.54.x and 2) 86.29.241.x to 86.29.255.x. The problem with these British IPs is they're pretty dynamic, so I want to avoid a rangeblock if possible. I'll keep an eye out and if there's still substantial socking, I'll do a rangeblock. His edits are usually reverted quickly anyway. Spellcast (talk) 12:27, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

JANET!

Thank God she left Island Def Jam. Now I can sign her when I get my own label! :) The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 21:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I know! I need to update the Discipline album info. Need to expand the info on the tour then below that do a section on the label split. Feel free to help if you want. We could take it to FA since we will have quite a lot of info now. — Realist² 21:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

LMP & MJ

every single sentece in that article has a source. just because you SAY that is in the book, doesnt mean its actually in there. all the yahoo facts are the same, but its worded in a better form. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ-x3 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Hard times

Yeah but if things get nasty will you back me up. Ceoil ^sláinte 02:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't actually know what the dispute is about (honestly I don't), I've just noticed some animosity between you guys/gals in recent weeks. At first I thought it was all joking around but obviously it is a proper dispute about something serious (in wiki relative terms). I'm generally not the nosy type to go looking for gossip, but since I see good editors upset, I should look at it. We are all here for the enjoyment stuff I guess. — Realist² 02:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

There is no dispute there; and I replied on Jays talk to that effect. Dry humour. The arb link was funny though, he. Ceoil ^sláinte 02:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Good, don't like seeing real hate lists. :-) — Realist² 02:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

And when the evidence is wholly otherwise? 03:12, 23 September 2008

I have no reason--none--to assume anything good from editors that attempt to strongarm others. My experience with you in particular has been decidedly detracting from wiki. I will reference it to my students at each possible juncture.

--Dr. America (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry you feel that way. — Realist² 03:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to have to side with Realist² on this one. You were adding terms such as "ultra" without sourcing it (at least originally), and were making personal attacks, such as this one. Useight (talk) 03:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Dr. America has also tried to start an arbitration case against me, and accused me of bigotry. It's all a bit too surreal right now. — Realist² 03:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

This is just too funny! One look at your self-idents, and the Gordian question just chokes one, "Let's see...I wonder if he could possibly be a bigot?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. America (talk • contribs) 04:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Would you please stop with the personal attacks. I have zero problem with conservative's. Some of my closest associates on wikipedia are conservative and I have not once uttered a bigoted comment their way. You should really review my edits to the Obama talk page (archives now), you will see that I am a neutral editor. The fact that I show the world my biases openly on my user page is a good thing, it makes me more accountable for my actions. I do not however expect to be called a bigot, to be accused of making personal attacks, to be accused of editorial bias, or to have an arbitration set on me. Also, please do not come over here (probably from conservapedia) and lampoon our community as leftist the minute you arrive. — Realist² 04:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I've never heard of conservapedia, I thought "your" (sic) community was supposed to be all of us, and will allow wiki's reputation to talk for me. Further, when one posts his positions in the manner in which you do, it is the farthest thing from bias awareness, it is provocation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. America (talk • contribs) 04:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

It's quite clear that all the comments I make on my user page, about politics or not, should be taken with a pinch of salt. They are a little tongue in cheek certainly, my whole user page is tongue in cheek. It's rarely serious. — Realist² 04:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from using "(sic)" in that manner as it is obvious that you are insinuating a personal attack. Useight (talk) 05:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Had you simply taken the time to read the entry unprejudicially, you would have seen that I did not. The point, let me spell it out for you, is that wiki poses itself as if it is for "all" people, but "Realist2" betrayed that when he said, "...our..." community. I.e., he tipped his hand and, may I infer quite plainly from the interjection, yours. ~Doc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. America (talk • contribs) 21:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I have to say

That I think providing a source for the blatantly obvious is stupid. But If i must. Glassedphase (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

It's just that we don't use WP:Original Research at wikipedia. Cheers. — Realist² 16:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

??Glassedphase (talk) 16:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

So your saying that this user is editing exactly them same stuff as me? Glassedphase (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

So I cant edit music articles because ive been editing some "jamla artciles"? Im a bit confused. But im off now anyway. :)Glassedphase (talk) 16:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Not at all, edit what you like, I'm just advising you on the fact that your editing pattern is very similar to a blocked editor. — Realist² 16:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Doll Domination

An user continues to removed information from the article Doll Domination. I'm not trying to have a edit war. Charmed36 (talk) 03:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm going off line but I have asked an admin to look into it. — Realist² 03:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I (knowing nothing about the album) can't see what he's removing. I gave him a 3rr warning, which now I am not so sure I should have done. Please don't you revert either, then you would be in violation as well. Did you try engaging him on the talk page? J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Am I

Being monitored by you?. You just seem to be on every page I go on. And Crystal Castles being electronic doesnt really need discussing. Glassedphase (talk) 18:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I watchlist all the article Jamalar used to edit, sorry if I bump into you a lot. — Realist² 18:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

ooh thats ok :) Glassedphase (talk) 18:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

4 in the morning

Stop what exactly?. Wheres the source calling it R&B?Glassedphase (talk) 18:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Crystal Castles

Crystal Castles are an electronic band. Something as silly as that does not really need a source. All the other genres dont have sources. Why dont you remove them? Glassedphase (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

We could do that. Alternatively find a source for your claim. — Realist² 18:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Trolls and smear merchants

I wasn't actually calling anyone a troll or smear merchant...but did claim that someone was "trolling" (as in the fishing term) my history page to dig up correspondences I had with another user...and I accused someone of "smearing" me by linking to the correspondence and trying to attach unfounded meaning to my actions.

I can see why some might consider this harsh language, so I will try to avoid using those terms in the future. I just tend to get annoyed and therefore a little hot-headed when someone posts a private correspondence I had (although I realize edit histories make nothing truly private). Ynot4tony2 (talk) 18:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Caden

I know nothing about Caden himself, as is normal here, but as you can tell, I would prefer him to realise on his own that "returning to the scene of the crime", as it were, for a victim, ain't going to solve anything. He may have unresolved issues but this is not the place for their resolution. I hate to imagine that he's winding us all up, but to be honest, if he's really seeking therapy here, that's a misplaced mission, as it is on any website. As regards WP, I really hope he'll try to concentrate on something that takes his interest. --Rodhullandemu 22:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Caden has spoken publicaly about his real life problems, I'm not sure I should repeat them without his blessing. It's clear in my opinion that Caden shouldn't edit sexuality articles and probably has a serious CoI. Thus I thing he should stay away from sexuality articles, be it enforced or not. Still he is a very good editor on other issues. — Realist² 22:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Forget the past and work together

I know you probably think i deserved to be blocked rght now but we need to put that behind us and work together to help keep womanizer junk and copyright vio free! Ogioh (talk) 22:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Agree. Am trying. — Realist² 22:30, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks xD Ogioh (talk) 22:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

SoWhy RfA

Hey Realist2, I just wanted to say though Andrew Kelly's comments are also incivil, I just wanted to point out that responding with incivility won't help the cause. It would just be best to ignore his comments as there isn't really point to them except for being incivil. As Kafziel said in WP:ANI, don't feed the trolls. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 04:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Will try, I'm staying away from that RfA now, you can't change or rationalize with people when they feel or believe things so strongly. Probably doesn't help that I'm a liberal nut. — Realist² 04:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Please Stop

Realist, please do not speak for me on my behalf. You have no business to put words into my mouth. I mean no offense to you, but I never agreed to any type of agreement in terms of avoiding any sexuality articles. All I said to you, was that I understood your suggestion, but I did not agree to any terms. Although I believe your intentions are good, I'd appreciate that you refrain from speaking on my behalf. At this point I have not been contacted by any admin, therefore I have no clue what options are available to me. Caden S (talk) 12:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Sure deal. :-) — Realist² 12:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Caden has asked me to ask you not to speak on his behalf. I see he already asked you, and you agreed, so I trust this is resolved? Just a note of clarification. -kotra (talk) 19:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

dates

Realist, you are most welcome! Tony (talk) 14:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Dates on Wikipedia

There was nothing wrong with the edit and i put it on the talkpage. You just didn't bother to check the source, plus the info is coming from Britney's official site. It's legit Ogioh (talk) 23:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)