Jump to content

User:Begoon/ACE2015

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a sortable table - click arrows in header row...

[edit]
Candidate Comments Opinion Result
Callanecc Officious, rules-bound. Not what I'm looking for at all. Oppose 5
Casliber Proven record. Sense of humour. Common sense. Experience. Obvious support. Support 1
Drmies Sometimes a little too "cliquey", but I nearly always agree with his decisions. He has wikipedia's interests at heart. Would do well in the role. Support 4
Gamaliel Too political/drama prone. I don't like GamePlayers and Gamaliel is one of those. Do not trust to be neutral. Oppose 9
GorillaWarfare Too political. Activist. Thinks you can recuse then unrecuse. Do not trust to be neutral. Oppose 7
Hawkeye7 Desysopped for cause. Oppose 12
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz Solid, experienced editor. Cares about the encyclopedia. Level headed. Support 18
Keilana Just doesn't give the "responsible and ready for authority" vibe to me. Sorry. Oppose 3
Kelapstick Solid, experienced editor. Cares about the encyclopedia. Level headed. Support 6
Kevin Gorman Too political. Breeze-driven activist. Seeks out drama and often makes poor decisions. Craves power/recognition. Do not trust to be neutral. No. Oppose 15
Kirill Lokshin Disappeared, then returned to explain and "demonstrate" how he could do what other admins were "too scared" to do. Don't trust his motives. Do not trust to be neutral. Oppose 8
Kudpung Means well, I think, deep down, but utterly fails to convey that, often upsetting users new and old with a surly and rude manner. Also seems very inflexible.

Acted ludicrously on his questions page. Not suited for position(s) of responsibility, imo. I seem to remember he was not always like this - maybe time has taken a toll?

Oppose 13
LFaraone I have not been impressed with his tenure to date. May mature for another term later. Oppose 11
Mahensingha Too inexperienced. Oppose 21
MarkBernstein Too political. Activist. Seeks out drama. Here for Mark Bernstein. No. Oppose 19
NE Ent I'd like to have supported Ent. It's a close call for me, but in the end I'm not comfortable he has the right balance between IAR and applying the strict letter of the law.

That's particularly important for this role, and flexibility is a crucial quality I'm looking for here.

Neutral 17
Opabinia regalis Excellent candidate. Would be a boon to the committee. Fresh and innovative. Support 2
Rich Farmbrough Have to stay on the fence. I like Rich - lots of common sense, but can be a touch too intransigent. That's not a good thing for ArbCom. Neutral 14
Thryduulf Poor performance in current committee. Officious, inflexible and rules-bound Oppose 10
Timtrent I'd like to support this candidate, but just too milquetoast, plus some odd edits wrt NOTCENSORED give me pause Neutral 16
Wildthing61476 Too inexperienced. Oppose 20