Jump to content

User:Ckatz/RfA thanks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  1. Support! Beat the nom. Will not go nutzo with the tools. Unlikley to block good-faith contributors without discussion first. ➪HiDrNick! 22:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)(02.03.08)
  2. Support per nom. Dlohcierekim 23:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)(02.03.08)
  3. Support No problems here. --Siva1979Talk to me 00:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)(02.03.08)
  4. Support Some very impressive contributions and experience. Definitely not going to misuse his new admin tools. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 00:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)(02.03.08)
  5. Support Great edit summary usage, good edit count, deserves the MOP. :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 00:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)(02.03.08)
  6. Support - should have had the mop by now.   jj137 (talk) 01:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Support. Very good editor. Malinaccier (talk) 01:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Support - I have the utmost confidence that this user will make a tremendous admin. Excellent editor, very versatile. Got tinkles. Wisdom89 (T / C) 02:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  9. Late to the party nom. support. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)(01.03.08)
  10. Support. Good all around, plus I have always been impressed with how well this individual handles unreasonable editors. Doczilla RAWR! 03:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  11. Support: I find that the editor has handled him/herself well in light of several bad-faith editors, and that the contributions thus far have been very positive. I see no reason why you would abuse adminship if so granted. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  12. Support You're not an admin? Burner0718 JibbaJabba! 03:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  13. Support Just talk to your partner about classical music stuff, OK? Keepscases (talk) 04:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  14. Looks good. Majorly (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  15. Support. Long-term editor with broad experience. Espresso Addict (talk) 11:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  16. Support. · AndonicO Hail! 11:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  17. Support - trustworthy editor. Addhoc (talk) 11:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  18. Support no evidence they will abuse the tools. SpencerT♦C 12:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  19. Support Seen him around doing great work. Will certainly make an excellent administrator, no doubt at all. --PeaceNT (talk) 13:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  20. Some outstanding work over at AIV. Rudget. 17:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  21. Support per above. NHRHS2010NHRHS2010 19:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  22. Support And this Rfa didn't happen before because...? :) Jmlk17 20:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  23. Support - prolific editor, great vandal-fighter, with the scars to show. Bearian (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  24. We've certainly been on opposite sides of the table on some issues, but I don't feel as if he would be a bad, or careless administrator. seresin | wasn't he just...? 22:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  25. yup - all the best Khukri 23:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  26. Support Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  27. Support As per nom. Good track with over 14000 mainspace edits.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  28. Support No problems here. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  29. Support. After reviewing Ckatz's contributions, I am confident that he has the necessary experience, and has sufficient levels of trust, to function as a project administrator. Best of luck, AGK (contact) 20:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  30. Support, seems a solid candidate. I am reasonably satisfied that they will not abuse the tools. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC).
  31. Yes Will (talk) 02:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  32. Support Sounds good Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 02:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  33. Support Best of luck. :) GlassCobra 07:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  34. Support. Anyone who has an external website dedicated to hating them, must be doing something right! I've seen this user's work related to Canadian places and Canadian stuff. He made a great little template for 8-way geographic locations. —MJCdetroit (yak) 15:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  35. Strong support, very responsible editor. @pple complain 17:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  36. Support Pleasent, civil, well-rounded editor who can only be a net benefit to the work Pedro :  Chat  20:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  37. Support good luck. Pundit|utter 01:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  38. Support - Will make a fine addition to the admin corps. —Travistalk 16:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  39. Support - --Bhadani (talk) 16:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
  40. Support Sumoeagle179 (talk) 01:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  41. I have had positive experiences with Ckatz at WP:HEROES. –thedemonhog talk • edits 05:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  42. Bandwagon support. This candidate is a good one. нмŵוτнτ 14:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  43. Support Time to get your long overdue mop. ☯Ferdia O'Brien (T)/(C) 16:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  44. Support per below? --Niyant (talk) 20:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  45. Support You would make an excellent administrator! Johnny Au (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  46. Support - past contributions reveal an excellent article editor with a wealth of experience in the 'machinery' of Wikipedia. Should make a great admin. Euryalus (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  47. Support - Wow, impressive user. Give em' the mop. :p Tiptoety talk 01:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  48. Support - No problems here —ossmanntalk 20:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  49. Support - Seems solid in my book. ArcAngel (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  50. Support - Extensive line of edits. Puts helper tools to good use. Can be a good admin.  UzEE  21:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  51. Support - Good editor. - Shudde talk 00:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  52. Excellent user: will make great use of the tools. Acalamari 00:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  53. Support - With 20,000 solid edits and a great track record, why not? Littleteddy (talk) 13:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  54. Support I'll join in before this closes. --Groggy Dice T | C 15:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  55. suppport JoshuaZ (talk) 20:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ckatz/RfA_thanks&oldid=1142402750"