User talk:Fellytone

Welcome!

Hello, Fellytone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Kendrick7^talk 04:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

SmackBot

Sadly I have not yet developed a mediation module for SmackBot. I will glance at the article myself though. Rich Farmbrough, 04:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC).

3RR warning

Hi, you violated the 3RR rule on Institute for Policy Studies. In future you're likely to be blocked for 24 hours for doing this, so please read the policy carefully before editing again. Also, edit summaries like this are unacceptable. Please discuss issues calmly on talk in future. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^{talk contribs} 07:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The complete report of this case is at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RRArchive128#User:Fellytone reported by Theglowpt4 (Result: 31h). EdJohnston (talk) 04:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your note, I am sure SlimVirgin and EdJohnston are enough administrators to deal with this. See the reference to dispute resolution above. Rich Farmbrough, 17:00, 22 April 2010 (UTC).

Assange

Hi , I am looking at your contributon to this article .. ultra-nationalist. Russian ambassador to NATO Dmitry Rogozin ' '

There doesn't appear to be any mention of this person in the article, am I missing something, also we don't label people like that, please comment if I have missed something, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 20:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

No talkpage discussion and you stuff your desired addition in again, hilarious, another editor has removed it again, will you just stuff it back in again? Are you interested in discussion ? Off2riorob (talk) 14:39, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring

Since you indicated you do not consider yourself amply warned, this is a reminder to read WP:3RR which outlines both a bright red line for which editors will almost certainly be blocked for, as well as circumstances short of that bright red line and will lead to blocks in other circumstances. I strongly suggest you famliarize yourself with the content of that page.Bali ultimate (talk) 11:59, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:CounterPunch

In case it wasn't clear, I was specifically asking you to withdraw and/or apologise for the comments you made at Talk:CounterPunch. Rd232 ^talk 13:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Fellytone. You have new messages at Rd232's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

An/I

I've mentioned you here. [1].Bali ultimate (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

Further to the above, I've blocked your account for one week. Neither your combative approach to working with other editors nor your apparently agenda-driven edits are acceptable in a collaborative, collegiate environment. You are, however, welcome to contribute with due regard for appropriate weight, consensus, edit-warring policy and especially BLP policy when your block expires.

If you would like a review of this block from an uninvolved administrator, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene^talk 11:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Note to reviewing admin: Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Fellytone for the background. EyeSerene^talk 11:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

• Don't treat Wikipedia as a battleground. Your filing at ANI was wholly without merit, you are lucky not to be blocked again for disruption and attempting to game the system. Fences&Windows 22:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Rd232

By reverting the same text as soon as your block expires, you are continuing the same WP:BATTLEGROUND behaviour. You are also reinserting WP:BLP violations which completely unbalance the article. I'd also like to know if this is you. Finally, this basically needs more discussion; if you're not willing to accept the talk page consensus, use dispute resolution like an WP:RFC or a noticeboard. Rd232 ^talk 06:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

As per my response to your response on your talk page to my comment:

1. 1 You haven't answered my question. Where's the evidence I am continuing to engage in WP:Battleground behaviour?
2. 2 "WP:BLP applies to any content about living persons, not just to biographies." Right. So which is why it doesn't apply to CounterPunch because it's a MAGAZINE.
3. 3 So what if my edits unbalance the article? If you feel that it's unbalanced then add quotes of praise for the magazine.
4. 4 There's nothing wrong with putting BLP content out of articles in the absence of consensus, although in this case what we're dealing with isn't a BLP issue. I'd also say just as much as there consensus for the inclusion of my content, there is no consensus of exclusion of my content either.
5. 5 No i am not going to apologize for calling you something true. Which is why I'll be posting this on my talkpage if you want to respond. Although I should let you know it doesn't matter whether you do or not. Fellytone (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2011 (UTC) Fellytone (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

edit warring warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
3. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Riiiight. And you too.Fellytone (talk) 03:13, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Stop

Stop edit warring on User talk:Bali ultimate. You've left your warning and the user has removed it. That's enough. Move on. Tiderolls 03:21, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

And I've blocked you for 72 hours. Users are allowed wide latitude on their own talk pages about what they remove. Removing a warning is an implied notice that the warning has been read. You breached 3rr, and you're editing privileges have been revoked. If you'd like to have the block lifted please use {{unblock|your reason here}} to contact an administrator. AniMate 03:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Given that you have got yourself into so many edit wars in such a short time and that you seem intent on continuing, as evidenced by the way you have continued so far despite many, many warnings from uninvolved editors and admins and that you are treating Wikipedia like a battleground, I have blocked you indefinitely. I would suggest that agreeing to a one revert per page per day restriction and an interaction ban with User:Bali ultimate would be a good start in convincing me or any other uninvolved admin that you're actually going to edit within our policies. You can, of course, appeal this action and/or the original 72-hour block or simply request unblocking upon agreement to the conditions I've set out and any others that uninvolved admins think are reasonable, by using the {{unblock}} template. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:34, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:34, 16 January 2011 (UTC)