User:IvoShandor/Template:NRHP PR instructions
WikiProject National Register of Historic Places' Peer review process exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors, and is intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work, often as a way of preparing good article candidate or featured article candidate. It is not academic peer review by a group of experts in a particular subject, and articles that undergo this process should not be assumed to have greater authority than any other. For feedback on articles that are less developed, use the article's talk page or requests for feedback. For general editing advice, see Wikipedia style guidelines, Wikipedia how-to, "How to write a great article", and "The perfect article". Articles that need extensive basic editing should be directed to Pages needing attention, Requests for expansion or Cleanup, and content or neutrality disputes should be listed at Requests for comment. |
The path to a featured article |
Nomination procedure Anyone can request peer review. The best way to get lots of reviews is to reply promptly and appreciatively on this page to any comments. If you post a request, please do not discourage reviewers by ignoring their efforts. While not required it is strongly encouraged that users submitting new peer review requests choose an article from those already listed to peer review. Preference should be given to those articles which have been listed the longest with little or no response (not including automated peer reviews). To add a nomination:
Your review may be more successful if you politely request feedback on the discussion pages of related articles and/or send messages to Wikipedians who have contributed to the same or a related field. How to respond to a request
How to remove a request
After removing the listing, contributors should replace the {{peerreview}} tag on the article's talk page with {{oldNRHPpeerreview}}. How to resubmit a request
|
Related pages:
Topic-specific peer reviews (full list):
|
Other peer reviews:
- External peer review External agencies
- Scientific peer review Scientific experts
- Academic peer review
- Picture peer review
- Portal peer review