User:Redfarmer/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/temp

April Fools MfD's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: procedural close, Speedy Keep (April Fools). ^Avic_ennasis @ 10:29, 5 Tevet 5777 / 10:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling

Something smells around there, maybe something big just happened? Anyway, it's just not in the right shape - needs some bigger bones. Delete. D.M.N. (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy keep - as talk page of active project. I have no sense of humor. John Carter (talk) 13:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I guessed that from the Speedy Keep. :) D.M.N. (talk) 14:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete ;)--3L VaK3r0 19:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This wasn't funny. In my view, these type of things should be banned from Wikipedia (with the exception of user talk/user spaces). It's just disruptive, and doesn't have a good place in this encyclopedia. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Its for humor, nothing else. Have some sense of humor Rob..--3L VaK3r0 21:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: Wha the hell? Active talk page of a active WikiProject with hundreds of edits every day by members. NimiTize 20:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • It was a humorous thing.--3L VaK3r0 21:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Pro wrestling is like so 80's... we should ban it from the internet! grrr! Feedback ^☎ 21:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was bursted the April Fools bubble. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 18:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Vandal Coaching

• Delete: Disruptive, unhelpful. We should make project to counter vandalism, not to promote vandalism. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy keep: at least for the next 24 hours. I've got my iron all fired up, and a pile full of socks to get through._{The public face of GB}^T/C 12:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep for ~12 hours - it's an April Fools' joke, we've got 12 more UTC hours, just leave it be. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 12:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Userfy it on April 2, 2008. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 12:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Per Keilana, then a speedy delete. Rudget. 12:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep until 2 April and then userfy. Hut 8.5 12:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep until April Fools Day finishes all over the world, thus 2 days. Then userfy/delete accordingly. '''[[User:WBOSITG|<font color="darkblue">weburiedoursecrets</font>]][[User talk:WBOSITG|<font color="navy">inthegarden</font>]]''' (talk) 12:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep until this AFD is over, then userify. This is pretty funny, if you're an insider, and possibly confusing if you're not. ++Lar: t/c 13:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• BJAODN. Shameless advertisement for bjaodn.org, quite obviously, so put it on there anyhow. :-) — Rickyrab | Talk 13:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep until April 2; then userify. seicer | talk | contribs 13:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy close per above. Mike R (talk) 14:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete once April Fools day is over everywhere. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep for the rest of April Fools day. --Drahcir ^{my talk} 16:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep ALWAYS It's like that game of football they had between the trenches.Babyblue111 (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was unfunny April Fool. Moreschi (talk) 10:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

The Articles For Deletion process encourages gross incivility, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, biting of newcomers and wikidrama, all of which are rampant in deletion discussions. In addition, it discourages article writing and is a waste of editors' time, time which could be better spent writing GAs. J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 10:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Comment I'm hoping that this nomination is a joke but, just in case it isn't my "vote" is Keep. The process doesn't encourage any of the bad behaviour stated above. All of said bad behaviour is down to individual editors and can be avoided if people just "got along". Writing good articles is very important and part of the process is learning what are bad articles and why. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was o_O NonvocalScream (talk) 12:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

Causes needless Wikidrama and other general annoyance to editors. Elfits FOR GREAT JUSTICE (klat) 10:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete just to please you - mate! D.M.N. (talk) 12:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Nuke it immediately. Finally we're coming to reason. Dorftrottel (harass) 12:40, April 1, 2008

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: So meta. (non-admin closure) Aasim (talk) 02:20, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – (View MfD)​

Terrible joke. No one is as funny as me. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete and WP:SALT as repeatedly recreated. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 23:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.