User talk:Ulmgambolputty
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Ulmgambolputty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Rehabilitation Project Force. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
-- Cirt (talk) 14:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
You are notified that:
- Remedy 4 in the above arbitration case authorizes administrators to ban, at their own discretion, any editor from the Scientology topic if their editing is disruptive;
- Remedy 5.1 in the above arbitration case authorizes administrators to topic ban, at their own discretion, any editor from the Scientology topic if they are a single-purpose account promoting an identifiable agenda;
- I consider edits such as [1] and [2] to be disruptive and agenda-pushing, and should you continue to edit in this manner, you will be topic banned.
Please take care in future that you follow our project's behavioral and editorial policies whilst contributing. Tim Song (talk) 01:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- We can improve the tone of the article to read more encyclopedic and consistent with Wikipedia:WTA#Controversy_and_scandal, but if you make threats that becomes destructive of the cooperation required. Think over the approach you take and have a good look at the the sort of person that represents you to be. Then come back and we'll talk things through. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulmgambolputty (talk • contribs)
- Per Remedy 5.1 of the above arbitration case, you are hereby banned from the Scientology topic, including all related articles, processes, and discussions, broadly construed, for one year. You may appeal this sanction at WP:AE or to the Arbitration Committee. Tim Song (talk) 17:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- We can improve the tone of the article to read more encyclopedic and consistent with Wikipedia:WTA#Controversy_and_scandal, but if you make threats that becomes destructive of the cooperation required. Think over the approach you take and have a good look at the the sort of person that represents you to be. Then come back and we'll talk things through. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulmgambolputty (talk • contribs)
May 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Islam and animals, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Islam and animals was changed by Ulmgambolputty (u) (t) deleting 8782 characters on 2010-05-06T12:08:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Arthur C. Clarke. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of DavidYork71 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |