User talk:Bongwarrior

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Unsigned messages will likely be removed. For messages left here, I will usually respond here. If I leave a message on your talk page, I will watch for a response there. Start a new talk topic. Archives Archive 1 (April 2007 – October 2007) Archive 2 (October 2007 – January 2008) Archive 3 (January 2008 – April 2008) Archive 4 (April 2008 – September 2008) Archive 5 (September 2008 – April 2009) Archive 6 (April 2009 – January 2010) Archive 7 (January 2010 – October 2010) Archive 8 (October 2010 – May 2011) Archive 9 (May 2011 – October 2011) Archive 10 (October 2011 – May 2012) Archive 11 (May 2012 – October 2012) Archive 12 (October 2012 – present) Speedy G3 Theo Bos (futbolista) Hello Bongwarrior, I like your username. At the moment I'm trying to learn as much as I can about vandalism and about deletion. I was looking over new pages and came across "Theo Bos (futbolista)". I was trying to figure out the best way to deal with it then I saw it had been deleted by you; thanks :). I get that it's clearly obvious that the page needed to be got rid of, but I just wanted to ask why you chose criteria G3. Personally I would have chosen A10 (the article added nothing to the existing article at Theo Bos (footballer)) or A3 (it contained nothing but an image). G2 might have worked too. Given the guidelines at WP:NOTVAND I was slightly surprised by the G3-ing of this seemingly inoffensive article. But I see you've blocked the user (User talk:Borreswafflertron) which makes me think maybe you've previously had dealings with them? Thanks :) —Noiratsi (talk) 08:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Hi there. As you've noted, a CSD candidate will sometimes be eligible under several different criteria. I usually try to use the one that seems to be the most appropriate for the situation. After I noticed the Theo Bos (futbolista) article - but before I deleted it - I saw that the user had also participated in a vandalism "raid" at the Jackson Murphy article, using the same Pokemon image, leading me to believe that the intent behind the created article was vandalism. If it had just been that one article by itself, with no other edits to judge intent, I probably would have used G2 as the reason, or possibly A3. A10 would also have been correct, but I hadn't investigated far enough to notice that there was a preexisting article with that name. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:11, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the reply! I hadn't looked at the user's previous contributions but now that I do I can see that they definitely were engaged in a vandalism spree using that one particular image. —Noiratsi (talk) 09:23, 3 March 2013 (UTC) You are quite welcome, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:27, 3 March 2013 (UTC) page move! I moved the page because it is not listed correctly. its using a general name and the person is a mayor. plus its missing his full title JR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACE1234 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Another deletion Was just wondering if this page could be deleted too. The other three were deleted so I don't see why this one should be as well. --Shadow (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC) I was planning on leaving it, since it was redirected, but it's not a particularly valuable redirect. So okay. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC) Page protection I noticed that there's been some vandalism to Mouse. I haven't been following the drama but I'm guessing it was the subject of persistant vandalism, was protected, was today unprotected and then immediately vandalized. You have my sympathy. What I wanted to say was that Grape is also routinely vandalized and I was wondering if that might also be worth protecting? I have no experience in this area but noticed what you'd done (or tried to do) with Mouse and thought it might be worth bringing it to your attention. There's no need to reply. Keep up the good work! Regards, nagualdesign (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Not a terrible idea at all, but I'd prefer to monitor it for a little while first. It does seem like most of the edits are vandalism, but the overall volume of edits is pretty manageable (and I did notice one or two good edits). This probably would be a good candidate for either semiprotection or pending changes at some point. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2013 (UTC) A cookie for you! Hello Bongwarrior, I will be celebrating my birthday on 19 March. So, I would like to give you a treat. If you decide to "eat" the cookie, please reply by placing {{subst:munch}} on my talk page. I hope this cookie has made your day better. Cheers! Arctic Kangaroo 15:02, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Thanks, I'm going to save it for later. Enjoy your birthday! --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Heh, edit conflict on DMacks talk page Not sure what's been left, but apparently you & I were reverting at the same time. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC) It's no problem. Your version actually ended up restoring a comment that really didn't need to be removed, so it looks fine to me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC) Cool...cookies all around! Shearonink (talk) 18:26, 19 March 2013 (UTC) Are you high? Me and my colleague did research for hours just to get the official name of the new stadium. We also had to converse with the new york jets administration and pull some favors for that new information on the New York Jets page. Did you even look it up to verify? How angry do you think Jared from subway is going to be? Assumptions do not make friends. Go smoke some weed. -Frustrated Editors