User talk:ClueBot Commons: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:05, 21 January 2014

ClueBot NG Links!

Report False Positives • Review edits for the dataset • Frequently Asked Questions

False Positives

If you believe that ClueBot NG has made a mistake, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report them here. It takes less time to report them to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively if reported in the correct location.

Purpose of this Page

This page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.

The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the [edit] link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.

Template:Archive box collapsible

ClueBots
ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script
ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Jaw Dropping Performances

I move we start a list of occurrences when ClueBot NG has demonstrated a surprisingly good eye for vandalism.

Featherwinglove (talk) 21:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC) My Cousin Vinny's was not directed by Frank Capra III: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_Cousin_Vinny&diff=589248591&oldid=589248588[reply]

Mysql IDs

FYI it appears as of this revert Cluebot NG no longer posts a MYSQL ID with its edits, it just shows 0. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the bot has a limited amount of MYSQL IDs it can use. Once it reaches this limit, it recycles the old ones and starts at 0. K6ka (talk | contrib) 22:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It did like 17.5 hours worth of edits with an ID of 0 and then when there was a MYSQL ID again it started back up with the next ID number from when it stopped editing, ID 1656332 ID 1656333 --Jnorton7558 (talk) 23:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can't report false positive

I wasn't able to report it (the page appears to be down), but this revert was a false positive. Tad Lincoln (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ClueBot NG dead again?

I swear. This is like the third or fourth time ClueBot NG is down again. As of this writing the bot hasn't reverted a single edit for almost an hour. K6ka (talk | contrib) 17:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Odd warning sequence

At User talk:Mommatruth2 gave level 1 - but then 2 days later only did level 1 again, should it not have been level 2? Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Crazy Idea for the Future of ClueBot NG

So, seeing that CBNG's been experiencing a few hiccups recently, I wanted to present a new, wild idea that might've been composed while sitting on the toilet (In reality, the idea came to me one night whilst asleep). My idea is that we set up a "ClueBot NG 2", but it won't replace the existing ClueBot NG. ClueBot NG will be hosted on the Wikimedia Labs Server (like it is now), while CBNG2 will be housed in another external server. Both bots will be running simultaneously, but they should be coded in such a way that they'll be able to collaborate just fine, and not duplicate work or collide with each other. This kind of design is already in use on Wikipedia - the HBC AIV helperbots that maintain WP:AIV and WP:UAA. The goal of that design is to ensure that the AIV pages are always properly serviced, so I put the idea together to ensure that there will always be at least one bot actively fighting vandalism. So if there's a problem with Wikimedia's servers, it won't leave the encyclopedia to the mercy of delighted vandals. If that's not possible, we could always call the original ClueBot out of retirement as a temporary replacement if its younger brother ever goes down (because a crappier anti-vandal bot is better than no bot at all, IMHO).

Well, that's me just noting down some ideas. Doesn't have to become reality, but it would be nice if someone at least thought it over. K6ka (talk | contrib) 01:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chunqiu Ji

hi, this is the evidence:中国大陆电视剧列表_(2014年) which shows that it hasn't broadcast yet, thanks. --Pedrotangtang (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Banned

Hi you have been reported and im just letting you know. ok Clever Man. Thanks for your time trying to help the wikipedia community, unfortunetly your time is up, unless you undo your recent actions that is. Although im guessing such a Great Man Such as yourself wont as you think this is a hoax. well good luck trying to argue back when you cant because your banned Respected Person

@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
 hi, this is the evidence:[[zh:中国大陆电视剧列表_(2014年)|中国大陆电视剧列表_(2014年)]] which shows that it hasn't broadcast yet, thanks. --[[User:Pedrotangtang|Pedrotangtang]] ([[User talk:Pedrotangtang|talk]]) 17:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
+== Your Banned ==
+Hi you have been reported and im just letting you know. ok [[Ignorant|Clever]] [[Cunt|Man]]. Thanks for your time trying to help the wikipedia community, unfortunetly your time is up, unless you undo your recent actions that is. Although im guessing such a [[Prick|Great Man]] Such as yourself wont as you think this is a hoax. well good luck trying to argue back when you cant because your banned [[Asshole| Respected Person]]