User talk:Tide rolls: Difference between revisions
→Stole your revert :D: new section |
|||
Line 236: | Line 236: | ||
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carrick-on-Suir&action=history |
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carrick-on-Suir&action=history |
||
xD [[User:Hello71|Hello71]] ([[User talk:Hello71|talk]]) 03:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
: Oh right, colon is for indent. Whoops. [[User:Hello71|Hello71]] ([[User talk:Hello71|talk]]) 03:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:32, 7 December 2011
To Leave a New Message Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks. |
If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. (I will respond on my talk page unless you specify otherwise.) Thank you. |
I prefer to maintain the continuity of threads by keeping them in a single location when possible. If you post a message here I will almost certainly reply here. If I've left a message on your user talk I will watch your page for any reply. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
My edits
Every one of my edits was true to fact, including that certain articles are hoaxes because they show too much bias towards proponents of woo. So please leave my edits intact. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeptic25 (talk • contribs) 01:09, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- You would most likely benefit from checking into the aims and goals of this project. Alternately, you could consider not editing here. There are other options, but I don't have the time to go into all of them. Regards Tiderolls 01:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
whoops - wrong page
(removed last edit by me - apparently wrong person by mistake) --Doug Coldwell talk 22:54, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
how could you remove my post on red cardinals!!!?????? i posted that Tide Rolls is awesome and you deleted it????? i change my mind, now you are not awesome anymore!!!!!! >:( have a nice day! \(o.o\) to the door! (/o.o)/ to the wall! (|o.o|) to the ceiling!
I think i have made my point here. Good day Sir! Ciao! goodbye! Go away! ♫ you say goodbye, and i say hello, hello, hello hello, don't know why you say good bye i say hello♫ Bye! I hate you!(just kidding) Your awesome!(just kidding again!) ^^^^^ just kidding about the just kidding part! so Jimmy Wales is your name! and my name is Whails Jemmy!
P.S. All of the above is just a joke! but seriously why would you delete my post on the cardinal thread saying that you are awesome??? i would of kept it :)
You are truly awesome!
keep the wiki going! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.247.220.112 (talk) 01:19, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Language links
Is this correct for use as a language link (I don't know the proper term) "en:Десантные корабли-доки типа «Уидби Айленд»" i.e. the en: with Greek letters? I would think it should start with "gr:" (or the correct Greek language code) AdmiralHood (Talk:AdmiralHood) also has ru: followed by English wording where crylic would seem to be appropriate. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- I do not understand the edit you wish to make nor the "Russian" edit you refer to as an example. Can you show me a diff? Tiderolls 01:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- It was fixed by AdmiralHood. I would say that I don't understand. Thanks for your time. Jim1138 (talk) 01:56, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Bosnian pyramids
I posted an edit to the Bosnian Pyramids entry, offering an alternative view to the subject matter from that posted on Wikipedia.
This was removed by you 12 mins later. Can I please ask why?
Regards
79.232.136.50 (talk) 21:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Certainly. Your edit was a commentary on the objectivity of the article. Discussion of article content and/or ideas for article improvement should take place on the article's talk page. I hope this answers your concern. Thanks for your polite message. Tiderolls 21:46, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
You've beat me to vandalism 3 or 4 times in the past 10 minutes - with the same tools I use. Wow! WikiPuppies! (bark) 22:38, 12 November 2011 (UTC) |
Dear Guy Who obviously knows nothing about the minnesota vikings
Do you have any proof that my edit was untrue and unconstructive? If you do the show me. Society — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.71.107.13 (talk) 18:42, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Dear guy who obviously can't post to the correct user page
The "edit" is its own proof. But, yeah....thanks for stopping by. Tiderolls 20:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
Hello Tide rolls. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know however, regarding DANCA DECUROOOOO, that tagging articles for speedy deletion moments after creation as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3) and articles created through the Article Wizard, is too fast. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), pure vandalism (G3), and copyright violations (G12) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Puffin Let's talk! 21:33, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Of course now I can't see the content I tagged so I can't say for sure, but I wouldn't have tagged the article without good reason. 15 miniutes or 15 years wouldn't make much difference in some cases. If this instance doesn't fit that bill I'd be surprised. Tiderolls 22:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
That was some epic reverting you did back there! Nice job. Brammers (talk/c) 22:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Also, thanks for helping out there. See ya 'round Tiderolls 22:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
I got in trouble and I don't know why :(
Dear Sir or Ma'am,
I am at the library and went to wikipedia to look something up.....this is what appeared on my screen. I have never edited something on this site. Am I still in trouble?
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Inc. Records, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Inc. Records was changed by 169.139.19.208 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894304 on 2011-09-28T21:19:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:19, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Inc. Records with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:23, 28 September 2011 (UTC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.139.19.208 (talk)
- No, you are not in trouble. That warning was left for an edit that was made in September. IF you do nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about. Regards Tiderolls 21:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Seems to be a school IP, Tide, so I've added a shared IP edu header; hope that's OK. Chzz ► 22:10, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help, Chzz. I'm at work presently and am not able to follow through as completely. See ya 'round Tiderolls 22:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
what????/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.145.106.156 (talk) 20:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
64.228.159.145
Could you extend this block for a month? This individual is a long term vandal who has been at this for years.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:43, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Also disable talk page editing.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:44, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
And help me modify the edit filter that normally prevents him?—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:48, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
I requested protection for it.--1966batfan (talk) 01:48, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Wooo...edit filters are beyond my technical abilities. I will contact those that will be able to help, though. Thanks for the heads up. Tiderolls 01:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Protection isn't necessary. Tide rolls needs to revoke his talk page access. Tide rolls, he has been at this for six years now. He is not going to listen to reason. Check User:Ryulong/Sandbox#Saban troll for the full shit.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Gfoley beat me to it. Things should quiet down a bit now. Tiderolls 01:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well, he did trigger his filter. Just need more on it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 02:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Gfoley beat me to it. Things should quiet down a bit now. Tiderolls 01:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Wikih101 talk page notice you sent
Thanks for the notice. By the way, the user "I am Buck, the sled dog" was my family's account and they told me to remove the banner so I was just helping them.Wikih101 (talk) 04:06, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Did you know that user accounts can only represent individuals? See WP:NOSHARE. Forging the signature of other editors (as you did here and here) is also prohibited. See WP:Signature forgery. You probably should delete those posts and do not repeat this practice. Regards Tiderolls 05:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
leave it be
drop it mate leave it move on walk away — Preceding unsigned comment added by Likefullyuleh (talk • contribs) 17:54, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
alright alright ill stop i was just having a bit of fun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Likefullyuleh (talk • contribs) 18:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Mop & bucket
- Just to let you know, it's great to see you with that familiar mop & bucket again, best and cheers! --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 11:54, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, Dave. Thanks for all your help as well. Tiderolls 12:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
So far...
...so good. Drmies (talk) 22:01, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- Special teams again. Still, they looked good. Tiderolls 12:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 15:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Frozen4322 : Chat 15:34, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Edits - The Hilltop Hoods
The first edit is definitely correct, as there should be a space between a word and a subsequent bracket.
The second edit is up for debate, however they are an Australian band and 'recognise' is Australian spelling.
203.45.222.191 (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- I've reinstated your changes as they appeared, generally speaking, to be needed. I would ask that you consider a few points. Re: Australian spelling; yes, national varieties of English are suggested to follow the article subject's origin. Note "suggested". WP:ENGVAR also mentions consistancy and stability. Not that your edit violated the letter or even the spirit of that guideline, it's simply worthwhile to remember that change for the sake of change is rarely helpful. Please note the "Show preview" button immediately to the right of the "Save page" button when on the editing page. This feature helps one consolidate one's edits into fewer attempts. Also, if you would consider employing edit summaries (see Help:Edit summary) to aid other editors in understanding your edits it would go a long way to avoid confusion and time-consuming follow-up. Thanks for your polite message. Tiderolls 04:52, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello
I was putting some random stuff up there to check how fast you guys detect the problems and what you do with them. You guys are pretty impressive! You detected the problem about 15sec after i edited it. Now I know that the wikipedia is a reliable source :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.182.10 (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Spelling de-correction
Thanks for letting me know. I don't know why I reverted that one. Not for the spelling. I'll be more careful. Keep up the good work! Jim1138 (talk) 05:37, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
How to make username effects or something like you have?
Because I want to make my own. xPgLZ22X (talk) 13:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
You are beating me to the punch like crazy tonight Guerillero | My Talk 01:02, 2 December 2011 (UTC) |
Question
Hi seem to have changed my vandalism. May I ask why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mewuzhere (talk • contribs) 01:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Of course you may. Tiderolls 01:34, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Okay Why then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.13.217 (talk) 01:25, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Football
If Bama and LSU were in different divisions, we could have played three games this year. That would be fun. Well, who can beat LSU, except they themselves? Drmies (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- Simply unbelievable...please, God, let us have another chance. Tiderolls 02:04, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, OKState put up a good show... But there should be no doubt. Drmies (talk) 04:55, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. It's a shame that our opinion is of little importance, n'est ce pas? Tiderolls 04:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, OKState put up a good show... But there should be no doubt. Drmies (talk) 04:55, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Stole your revert :D
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carrick-on-Suir&action=history
xD Hello71 (talk) 03:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh right, colon is for indent. Whoops. Hello71 (talk) 03:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)