User talk:Wysprgr2005

U POUR ADMIN, U UPDATE VANDAL COUNT, WHILE REAL ADMIN RVTS HAHAHAHAH!!!AH

Say after me...

No More Bush, phew!

File:Waxed pudenda.jpg

LOLZZ MAYBE YOUZ WANTS TO CHECK YUR PAGES BEFROE YOU PROTECT SUM????

PS I DROVE TO WORK JUST SO I COUDL MAKE THIS EDITS!!!! LOLLL>>>

I'm not that active these days, but I'm still around. Feel free to send me an extra poke here or via e-mail for anything, trivial or important (or to just say hi).
E-mail: Special:Emailuser/Ned Scott

Archives • ℹ
1. 02/06 - 05/06 2. 06/06 3. 07/06 - 08/06 4. 08/06 - 09/06 5. 10/06 - 11/06 6. 11/06 - 01/07 7. 02/07 - 03/07 8. 04/07 - 05/07	9. 05/07 - early 08/07 10. 08/07 - 10/07 11. 11/07 - mid 02/08 12. mid 02/08 - mid 05/08 13. mid 05/08 - mid 07/08 14. mid 07/08 - 11/08 15. 12/08 - 05/09 16. 06/09 - 04/11 17. 05/11 - 06/18

Lice Capades

Well, I don't really see the problem with what I put up, since I'm a little unclear on what "unconstructive" means. I mean, what I put up was simply what happened, I didn't replace any major information I just added to it.

Hold on I'm a bit confused here. I see you reverted your undoing of my addition to Lice Capades - so are you fine with it? Also, I see you incorrectly stated I vandalized your talk - I was simply making a second quick edit because I forgot to sign. AznWarlord (talk) 03:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay, cool. Looks like you've done a good job otherwise from seeing your talk page. Great job. AznWarlord (talk) 03:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I see that guy's a douche bag . . . AznWarlord (talk) 03:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

The guys who are vandalizing you're talk page, with "Monkey boys" and whatnot. AznWarlord (talk) 03:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Kungfumagazine.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Kungfumagazine.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:13, 5 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

PlayStation Network registration from a PC

What's the URL to use to join the PlayStation Network from my PC? - Brian Kendig (talk) 10:57, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the information! I had hunted for it but ended up coming nowhere near the real thing. If you haven't already, would you please link to that site from the PS3 article? - Brian Kendig (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Why?

--Arthur 2045 (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Hall of Fame issues

Please see WP:Baseball talk page for discussion on this matter. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 19:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

What did i do wrong

i dont understand what i did wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandymorco (talk • contribs) 04:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

what did i do i added the theme for survivor series 2008 how is that vandailism Jonweaver I put the truth on the city high web page how is that Wrong??? m31p —Preceding unsigned comment added by M31p (talk • contribs) 01:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Warning

So sorry about that - you reverted right as I went to revert and warn someone :( Apologizes for having that end up on your page instead. Shell ^babelfish 11:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Oops

Sorry, I accidentally reverted your edits on Sunil Shetty. I'm just letting you know it wasn't intentional.--Parthian Scribe 23:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Dalit Christians

Please tell me why the Edits are not constructive. 59.93.33.45 (talk) 23:44, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Ever grateful for any help . 59.93.33.45 (talk) 00:11, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

The AICC always gives its own figures. With only 116000 Christians in the whole of the area, those figures might not look alright to some people. You might use a media source for better credulity; or the figures of compensation announced and calculated by the government. Two pastors were reported killed, in any media? 59.93.33.45 (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC) Please discuss, if you do not mind. 59.93.33.45 (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

It is a much edit-warred page. I suggest caution. POV sources do harm to the intent. It would be best to hold the insertion of the AICC data in abeyance till we find a media source. What do you say? 59.93.33.45 (talk) 00:37, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I suggest that you remove the section till someone sources it more credibly. 59.93.33.45 (talk) 00:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

No, I would be violating the 3R rule if I do so. Hope you understand. 59.93.33.45 (talk) 00:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Reverting own revert is not 3R. Anyway, I leave it to you [smiles] 59.93.33.45 (talk) 00:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

You bet

No problem. Some people... lol Sionus (talk) 01:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Since you're usually on here vandal fighting the same time I am, you're welcome to ping me if you need a guy like that blocked. I've got IMs that I'll answer pretty quickly too if you use those (User:Shell Kinney/Contact). Anyways, blocked that one ;) Shell ^babelfish 02:09, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

New Message

Hello, Wysprgr2005. You have new messages at Parthian Scribe's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Parthian Scribe 02:38, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Zytom

I removed your CSD#G7 template, since the author did not delete all the content, and the article already had another db tag. --Terrillja (talk) 03:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

CWDHS Vandalism

Apparently, if vandalism constitutes making a page more accurate and relevant then I must be a vandal, or you must be a complete prick. Perhaps, if you had actually taken the time to read the section which I was trying to remove, you might have noticed the following.:

it is a list

it is irrelevant and uninteresting to anyone reading the page

it is outdated and subject to constant changeability

Seriously though, if this is not enough to convince you that such a section should be present on wikipedia ask yourself this: would you care to know all the teachers who taught at your high school 5 years ago? If you fail to respond to this in an intelligent and reasonable manner, you will only further incriminate yourself (as far as you can on the internet in terms of asshattery, at least) --The Man in the Ceiling (talk) 03:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

User and talk page

Thanks for the reversions. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 04:37, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

speedy tags

I think your Huggle is not working right. when you use it, you need to check afterwards that it makes the appropriate entry and edit summary. Please use G7, db-author, only when you are the only author of the page, the author specifically requests deletion somewhere, or the author blanks the page. -- not on pages which the author ought to blank if he had any sense. Use test page, or vandalism or the like for those. DGG (talk) 23:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Please...

Please stop reverting edits on user talk pages. I understand the rms one, but talk pages, I posted nothing harmful. Keep this up, and I'll report you. 190.58.10.200 (talk) 01:53, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

After viewing your contributions, I noticed you just revert stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.58.10.200 (talk) 01:58, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Reporting to AIV

Hi Wysprgr2005, did you try to report User:24.205.225.15 to WP:AIV after you reverted his vandalism after final warning? My automatic reporting didn't work in huggle for some reason, and when I tried to report manually, that didn't work either. I wanted to know if it's just me, or some problem with huggle. Chamal ^talk 03:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I've manually reported the IP. I'll drop a message about this at the feedback page. Chamal ^talk 03:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

question

Hey I have a question since I'm sort of new to wikipedia, how do you change the title of an article after you create it? Should I capitalize the R and the S in my new article Podgorica rail station? -User:Balkanskiredneck

But how do you do it? Can you do it yourself since I don't know how? It's probly really easy to do and i must sound dumb but I jus don't know how to change article title. -User:Balkanskiredneck

ok thanks very much -User:Balkanskiredneck —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC).

Hey!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For Fighting With Those Vandals earlier Today. You Rock! ^^ II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 15:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank You

I don't know how you keep up with all these losers vandalizing the Wiki. Good Luck —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yemenreform (talk • contribs) 16:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Question? I am having a little trouble with a user MrOllie that keeps adding negative specific on a page thats suppose to show general information about Yemen. Do you know what is the best way to deal with these kinds of people on Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.9.214.45 (talk) 02:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Nicolaus Copernicus

Hello! Just to let you know (if you didn't already), Doezxcty (talk · contribs), a user you warned, is a sock puppet of a banned user, Serafin. IMO I do not feel that these sockpuppets need to be warned, as they will eventually be blocked within the next ten minutes. SchfiftyThree ^(talk!) 23:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Cluebot

Huh. I've never actually seen anybody revert Cluebot until now. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 00:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Your revert of me in Alice Palmer (Illinois politician)

Hello. I noticed you reverted me in an article, Alice Palmer (Illinois politician), recently, and that revert had the effect of adding vandalism that I removed back into the article. (diff: [1]) I figured it was probably a mistake, so I figured I just ask you to be careful about your reverts and to make sure they remove, rather than re-add, vandalism. I have re-reverted your revert, so as to remove the vandalism again. Thanks. ⇔ ∫Æ_S dt @ 03:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Re-added vandalism

Hi, You re-added the vandalism that I reverted in the prior revision. If it was an honest mistake, no worries. Please try to be more careful next time you revert vandalism. Nirvana888 (talk) 03:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I do not understand —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forryga (talk • contribs) 03:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

i fix spelling errors grammar and so on. why you are angry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forryga (talk • contribs) 03:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I did wrong grammar? So sorry. Please check if i made other mistake thankyou

I wanted to help

Thank you for protecting my talk page.

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Hey, you were great! Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. Maxis ftw (talk) 02:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, here's the link. Cheers~! Maxis ftw (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Your userpage

Just so you know, I'm trying to collect some information about the vandal. However, if you get tired of reverting him, I'll gladly protect it for you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:10, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

 Done. I'll keep watching your talk page, though. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem. And how about that. your userpage has all these reverts, but no vandalism. How strange the wiki is these days... ;-) J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm almost done collecting data. If he vandalizes again, I will strike. If that is ineffective, I will protect your talk page. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Question?

Why is leaving comments on User Talk pages classed as vandalism?

I have no intention of vandalising Wikipedia, It's a great project.

--144.136.148.19 (talk) 03:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

the warning you left me for arthur shawcross

Another IP user vandalized the article by putting replacing "masturbating" with "jerking off". I was simply correcting it before Calvin 1998 reverted my edits. I corrected it again before you reverted my edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.34.197.185 (talk) 01:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

re: recent warning at User talk:76.209.220.247

Hello Wysprgr2005!

I noted the recent warning you left at this IP regarding vandalism, and wanted to ask about it.

The last three warnings left there were all this month, and graduated from level 1 to a level 3 warning. By my reckoning, that would make the next warning a level 4 warning (the last warning had only been given a few days ago), however, you left a level 1 warning.

I was wondering if there was a reason why you stopped graduating the level of the warning. This has been on my mind for some time as I have seen a few editors do this, and it makes it much harder for stop vandalism, because some blocking admins refuse to block any vandal who has not seen 4 notices, one of which is a level 4 notice, no matter what is going on. On the other hand, I thought there might be mitigating circumstances that I am simply not seeing.

Anything you could share with me would help my thinking, and I would appreciate it.

Thanks in advance! LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

thx...

...for this! --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 05:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Um

I sent that user a message via their talk page. That is not vandalism. Your reversion has, however, proven my theory I am testing to be true. Editors revert *far* too easily. If I were a newcomer, I would never want to edit this encyclopedia again given the way I have been harassed. If this is removed, I will seriously consider never editing Wikipedia again. 130.126.76.118 (talk) 23:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk pages

Please read User_talk:GraemeL#Friendly_note_regarding_talk_page_messages. Caught me out as well. ;-) --GraemeL ^(talk) 00:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thankyou for the revert on my User Page! Dengero (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV report

Hi. WP:AIV is to report vandals. Please direct to WP:AIVU to report improper usernames, as you did to User:Waxanimalparts. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 06:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

User page

Thanks for the reversions. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 16:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Yep. If they return today then I'll probably do that. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 16:48, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

0=0

That guy was balnking a page he created to agree with deletion. Thanks Res2216firestar 05:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: User talk 172.131.183.18

I really wouldn't know. I'm not sure whether or not it counts as vandalism on his own talk page, honestly. I'll just keep reverting it. Friginator (talk) 06:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

good lad :O

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		well done m8

Heh

Well I have to say, that was my first vandalism warning. :) Juliancolton (talk) 01:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliancolton Alternative (talk • contribs)

Thanks you!

Thank you for reverting some vandalism on my talk page, much appreciated! Renaissancee (talk) 21:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Malicious John Merder

Just a friendly note on Malicious John Merder. I declined the speedy deletion request because there is a claim of importance (professional wrestler). If you think he's not notable, AfD would be the way to go. Also, a lot of editors feel tagging an article like this within a minute of creation is a bit bitey.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Wysprgr2005:/Editcounter

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User:Wysprgr2005:/Editcounter|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 00:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou

Thanks for removing vandalism from my userpage :)--Tangent747 (talk) 20:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:BLANKING

Users are permitted to blank their own talk pages per WP:BLANKING. Please do not revert them if they do. –xeno (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks

....for swiftly removing vandalism from my userpage. Much appreciated :o) David T Tokyo (talk) 20:46, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

SOUMITRA SEN

Howdy, I saw your speedy note on SOUMITRA SEN. Did you mean to add a g1 (patent nonsense) tag, or did I miss where the author requested deletion (the tag you used was g7, author requested deletion)? Many thanks and best wishes, --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem, I was just worried I had missed something. Thanks and keep up the great work! --TeaDrinker (talk) 21:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Laryngal Clitoris

Why did you delete my edits about the laryngal clitoris in "larynx"? It is common knowledge that some women and a few gay men can experience laryngal orgasms. Provide a source refuting this common knowledge or let my contributions remain. Thanks.

No need for a website. I have a book.

Sigmund Freud. "Totem and Taboo." Published by Alfred A. Knopf Inc and Random, House New York 1946. Sorry there is no ISBN since it is a bit old. —Preceding unsigned comment added by24.177.3.120 (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2009 (UTC)