User talk:晴朗天

August 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Red Fox Scholar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 14:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Time will tell. I told you so. The movie title is Soul Snatcher.

晴朗天 (talk) 03:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"no need nationality param since there is no change of nationality since birth."

"no need nationality param since there is no change of nationality since birth.:"

In your edits, where you specify "no need nationality param since there is no change of nationality since birth.", I would like to point out that nationality is not dependent on a delta. For those who would like to see the nationality of a person, it can be completely independent of a change. Whatever motivation you have for deleting a person's nationality, I believe is factually incorrect. You cannot change a person's birth history. Good luck trying to delete the Republic of China.MowerBreeze (talk) 12:38, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CMD (talk) 14:40, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Following up the above warning, please see Talk:Chen_Linong#Edit_warring. Please use the next seven days to discuss the matter. Daniel (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]