User talk:118.200.76.63

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

118.200.76.63 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a shared computer in the computer laboratory of the NUSS graduate club, Singapore. Any damage done to wikipedia is solely due to vandalism done by guests. Thus, this unblock has been requested for the benefit of our other guests. Thank You, Staff of the NUSS graduate club 118.200.76.63 (talk) 07:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whether the computer is used by you or by others, all we know is that someone from this IP address made problematic edits. The block is working as intended. Legitimate editors should create accounts elsewhere to avoid this problem, or they can wait for the block to expire in about two days. As such, I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 07:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is 118.200.76.63's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Boss (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references and does not appear to make a claim for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Boss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 118.200.76.63, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies[edit]

Hello, 118.200.76.63. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

This message is based on your post at the administrators' noticeboard, and applies to eDreams, eDreams ODIGEO, and any other people, places or things with which you may have an external relationship. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 08:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC) Understood. Thanks for sharing.[reply]

Your requests concerning eDreams[edit]

Good day,

In order to properly disclose your conflict of interest with regards to eDreams, you should first register an account, then follow the guideline cited just above. Further, please take note of the following:

Pages on Wikipedia are not part of any company's marketing, PR or branding out reach, and cannot be considered "your website". Editorial changes in line with our other policies that are properly sourced to reliable third parties will not be considered vandalism even if a company disagrees with the nature of the coverage.
Disputes that may or may not have arise with former members of your organization have no place on Wikipedia. However, negative allegations against living people require particularly solid sourcing relying on third party independent coverage. Failure to follow our policies regarding covering living people will lead to your editing privileges being removed, and the articles subject to disputes being locked from editing.

Regards, MLauba ^(Talk) 08:55, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks!

April 2018[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as done at EDreams ODIGEO.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MLauba ^(Talk) 18:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

EDreams ODIGEO[edit]

The content you're trying to add to EDreams ODIGEO is the same content which an editor at this IP address tried to add 29 April with this edit. Please read the section above on Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies and follow the instructions. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 11:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Brazil national football team, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nzd (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.