User talk:136.36.197.89

June 2020

Hello, I'm Nyook. An edit that you recently made to Nestor Lakoba seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Nyook ^✉ 18:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

136.36.197.89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Nikky4753". The reason given for Nikky4753's block is: "Deliberately triggering the edit filter".

Blocking administrator: ‪Materialscientist‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: A blocked vandal is operating from this IP address. Yamla (talk) 20:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

136.36.197.89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block evasion: WP:COPYRIGHT, etc. etc 136.36.197.89 (talk) 20:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Further frivolous appeals will result in talk page access being revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

136.36.197.89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block evasion: WP:COPYRIGHT, etc. etc.Yamla (talk) 20:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

TPA revoked. 331dot (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When should I remove the block message? 136.36.197.89 (talk) 15:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That depends. Are you the same person who operated the Nikky4753 account? --Yamla (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you are. Blocked again. Go find another hobby. --Yamla (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GOD! I AM NEVER VISITIING WIKIPEDIA EVER AGAIN! I AM CLEARLY NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE! THIS............ ENDS............ NOW! 136.36.197.89 (talk) 19:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

136.36.197.89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will start making useful contributions now.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. $Salvio$ 21:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing administrator, remember this user is evading a block on Nikky4753 so isn't eligible for unblock consideration here. And given their history of block evasion and vandalism, have zero chance of being unblocked there, either. As they are just wasting our time, I will go and revoke talk page access now. --Yamla (talk) 20:53, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.