User talk:142.189.96.88

August 2022

Hello, I'm GabberFlasted. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Coca-Cola Company, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GabberFlasted (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Coca-Cola Company. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Coca-Cola Company, you may be blocked from editing. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it's "disruptive" now? Funny, the other two er...let's call them editors, both had different reasons, both of which were trash. If you can't prove that my edit violates any norms of WP, then you are simply engaging in abuse to goaltend the namespace of a company rich enough to have people who do nothing but police their WP page. The "RS" edit was a joke (Pemberton's article is well-sourced), and elucidating relevant facts about the inventor of Coca-Cola is not POV. You haven't a leg to stand on! 142.189.96.88 (talk) 13:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I have already pointed out... WP:NPOV, WP:CIRCLE, and for your habits specifically, WP:CIVIL. GabberFlasted (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't say a word about POV, unless you're now admitting to being "Hey man im josh"...?

As for WP:Circle, is that like how you two clowns flung nonsense at me twice, then the third clown called it "disruptive editing"? You're disgusting, a paid troll for peanuts. Shame! 142.189.96.88 (talk) 13:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages are strictly for discussing the topic of their associated main pages and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about unrelated topics. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 22:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Dalai Lama's escape from China, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You have been blocked twice in a short wikipedia career, and it would be good to avoid the use of words like pathetic or goofs that by some editors can be understood as negative Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I don't make a career of this...maybe you do? Who is your paymaster? The Dalai Lama "article" is POV on its face, and the fact that you and other GOOFS flippantly and repeatedly revert without the slightest care about these "policies and guidelines" you dare spew at me is proof positive that you are merely goaltending articles that uphold the dominant capitalist narrative. Sorry, GOOF, but even Tenzing Gyatso says the government in BEIJING is the legitimate representative of Tibetans. Moreover, the word "escape" in the title and throughout the Amerikkkanized hit piece implies there was some impending danger to Gyatso, again disproved by his relations with the PRC today.

If you gave a flying Christ about the purported aims of Jimbo, you would work to improve articles rather than just block IP eds who make solid edits that you just don't likey. In short, GOOF, IP addresses are like water. Range block away, and you will hear the whining of Ottawa MPs from whatever other colonial squat you occupy. 142.189.96.88 (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.