User talk:152.200.176.25

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Malerooster (talk) 00:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Bruce Wayne (DC Extended Universe). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2023

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Evading a block by editing while logged out is also not permitted. Cullen328 (talk) 00:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

152.200.176.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You have no way to prove that I am that guy. As I see, that JeanCasti was blocked. This is a public IP, and what does that Barry care what is done here or not? I have my own life and I contribute here. I don't spend my whole life watching what others do. So please unblock me. This IP doesn't have to be blocked just because someone else made their edits here and made mistakes. here 152.200.176.25 (talk) 13:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It beggars belief that you are unrelated to JeanCastì. Yamla (talk) 14:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla, you can think whatever you want. I have a clear conscience but it doesn't take away the disappointment of how people like this exist in Wikipedia. You are supposed to collaborate as a family, not pull the rug out from under someone else who shows the ability to collaborate. That makes me different from Jean Casti and those who blocked him, and not content with that made me block myself with complaints as if we were in elementary school.--152.200.176.25 (talk) 15:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

152.200.176.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How do you expect anyone to build an encyclopaedia if there are unscrupulous people who live in the dark about what you do and/or don't do? This is an IP of a training centre of the Colombian Ministry of Labour, and that does not mean that you have to pay for what a trainee of this centre has done. That is why I kindly request my unblocking please. This cannot go on like this. The blocking time is an exaggeration; one month? It is called obsession to be aware of what others are doing and it is done by insane people, people who are sick in the head. 152.200.176.25 (talk) 13:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks ("obsession", "sick in the head") are not considered. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.