Jump to content

User talk:164.100.138.237

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Runner-ups when tallying

[edit]

Usually the correct usage is runners-up because we are talking about multiple runners. But when tallying the number of runner-up titles the correct usage is runner-ups. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Sunar—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kumal people. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Kumal people, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 07:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kumal people. Materialscientist (talk) 07:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Data compression have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop from too much disruptive editing

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Aj Ajay Mehta 007 (talk) 17:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that in this edit to Lohar, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lohar, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lohar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Interesting Geek (talk) 07:57, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lohar, you may be blocked from editing. Interesting Geek (talk) 09:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lohar, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. STC1 (talk) 10:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lohar. Interesting Geek (talk) 15:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lohar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Interesting Geek (talk) 07:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2022

[edit]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2022 Sydney International, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 10:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]