Jump to content

User talk:166.120.202.204

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[[Leeroy Jenkins

Could you find a reference for Stonkin???? clearly this is a contentious issue for some.. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chesham Building Society, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MarkyMarkD (talk) 21:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page South Coast United has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 02:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Incidents at Disney parks. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 02:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Incidents at Disney parks, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. McDoobAU93 (talk) 03:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2010

[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Camw (talk) 23:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Hershey's Kisses has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:14, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username N5iln. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Camp Westmont with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 22:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Frazis (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMesquito was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheMesquitobuzz 05:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheMesquitobuzz 05:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Frazis (March 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Frazis (April 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:39, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:39, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Luton Town F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 08:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:George Frazis, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:George Frazis

[edit]

Hello, 166.120.202.204. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "George Frazis".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 02:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]