User talk:166qq

Sources that don't meet WP:RS guidelines

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

166qq, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 166qq! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:15, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

A goat for you!

umm yeah hello excuse me but some of the things you said about George w bush are kinda false the war was justified and that's just my view ok.

hello i like vaporwave and cartoons AND YES I'M AN ADULT. 16:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Serious word of advice here

Read WP:IBAN.

Pretend that that's how your threat calling for LovelyGirl7 to be site banned ended, with an IBAN between the both of you.

Calling her a bigot and a ponzi scammer were a violation of WP:NPA. Doing so after you pushed for her to be immediately site banned (the sort of treatment we give Nazi pedophiles) for mentioning Will Ferrell, with a pretty clear political motivation -- well, that makes you the disruptive editor here.

The more you push at WP:AN for any action to be taken against LovelyGirl7, the more likely those actions are to apply to you. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Like, if you had caught me in a different mood, I probably would have blocked you for this. And I can't say that some other admin won't. You might actually want to leave a message at WP:AN to the effect of "OK, nevermind, sorry" to discourage that. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

<<HOLY MOLEY redacted>>.

May 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:50, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:166qq

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

–Ammarpad (talk) 05:52, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really, your defending dictator LovelyGirl7

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

166qq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is irrelevant. (Redacted) —LovelyGirl7 must be banned. I’m a male 2:04 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Obviously decline. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:08, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is virtually no chance you will be allowed back on Wikipedia. Don't bother trying. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note for UTRS Admin

Please see THIS AN thread, deleted user page, redacted user talk, and remaining live edits. Cheers. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]