User talk:174.4.185.9

Study abroad

Thanks for trying to work on this, but it may help you to look at WP:EDITWARRING and WP:3RR. If you think the several other editors are wrong, please don't edit war which will result in a block, but create an article and submit it via WP:AFC. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Policy analysis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 03:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spam warning

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 03:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Calvinism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lutheranism. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not original content but sourced but as you know introductions doesn't require sources and the added content only gives an overview of the article, specifically in this case from the sources presented.

Strategic Management

Don't start an edit war here - the notability of the article you inserted is questioned That means you make a case on the talk page for the inclusion, you don't simply reinsert it----Snowded ^TALK 17:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Snowded, I didn't add the article, I replaced the article with an open-source book that goes further than the article section. Kindly check this from your side to understand edit differences.

On the 20th October you replaced an article by a Harvard Professor with the open university one, this time you reinstated it with a different version. My reverts restore the position before you started to edit the article. ----Snowded ^TALK 18:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for seeing the current edit difference. The rest I leave since it has a fallacy. But I would like to remind you WP:WORKINPROGRESS for avoiding obstacles in times of active patrolling. Good day.

Changing one reference without posting a reason on the talk page and without saying you plan to do more does not qualify as WIP. ----Snowded ^TALK 12:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to The Hussy seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Trollhunters. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:14, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.