User talk:184.101.195.188

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2018 in the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2018 in the United States was changed by 184.101.195.188 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924053 on 2018-08-07T04:27:02+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:184.101.195.188 reported by User:SarekOfVulcan (Result: ). Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:34, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been semi-protected for the next five days, which means un-registered and newly registered users can't edit it. If you actually want to make changes, you don't have any choice about not going to the talk page and making a case. --Calton | Talk 03:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Making an assertion in an edit summary and thinking that's sufficient to do whatever you want IS "because I said so". There's a Talk page: use it. --Calton | Talk 00:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at 2018 in the United States

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 03:57, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

184.101.195.188 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe you banned the wrong person. 184.101.195.188 (talk) 05:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC) Summary: I see misleading wording then edit. A revert happens. I edit again and provide an explanation. I was personally attacked after providing an explanation on why I reverted. Two different users both reverted my edits without addressing my points. One makes an ironic comment about my point. I use a talk page. Then I get banned for edit warring. Timeline and relevant comments are below.[reply]

Decline reason:

The three-revert rule is a bright line, and you crossed it. That justifies a block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Timeline: I make a good faith edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2018_in_the_United_States&diff=853908762&oldid=853907671 with the following explanation listed in the revision comments: 19:05, 7 August 2018‎ 184.101.195.188 (talk)‎ . . (91,665 bytes) (-75)‎ . . (→‎August: →‎August: Last post and source were misleading; Trump did not call, command or demand to end the Russia Investigation. Please read the actual tweet. He said J.S. "should". Trump is J.S.'s boss, if Trump called for an end J.S. would be forced to comply because Trump is J.S.'s boss<source is Ben Shapiro>.)

Then I receive a personal attack: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2018_in_the_United_States&diff=853909300&oldid=853908762 19:11, 7 August 2018‎ SarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs)‎ . . (91,800 bytes) (+135)‎ . . (Reverted good faith edits by 184.101.195.188 (talk): Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest. (TW)) (Tag: Undo)

I fire back: 19:16, 7 August 2018‎ 184.101.195.188 (talk)‎ . . (91,665 bytes) (-135)‎ . . (Undid revision 853909300 by SarekOfVulcan (talk) Pushing fake news.) (Tag: Undo)

The user who disagrees makes a lazy response by disregarding previous comments.

01:08, 8 August 2018‎ Calton (talk | contribs)‎ . . (91,800 bytes) (+38)‎ . . (Reverted to revision 853909300 by SarekOfVulcan (talk): Nah, better wording. (TW)) (Tag: Undo)

I revert back explaining why:

04:48, 8 August 2018‎ 184.101.195.188 (talk)‎ . . (91,762 bytes) (-38)‎ . . (Undid revision 853955766 by Calton (talk) Misleading wording and false source, as previously explained.) (Tag: Undo)

I don't understand this users comment. Giving a clear explanation as to why I reverted is not "Because I said so". It is ironic because that is what they are doing. 09:54, 8 August 2018‎ Calton (talk | contribs)‎ . . (91,800 bytes) (+38)‎ . . (Reverted to revision 853955766 by Calton (talk): "Because I said so" is insufficient. Talk page. Use it. (TW)) (Tag: Undo)

I explain:

19:50, 8 August 2018‎ 184.101.195.188 (talk)‎ . . (91,762 bytes) (-38)‎ . . (Undid revision 854006801 by Calton (talk) Amazing. Accuses me of editing "just because I say so" without offering any explanation on why a reversion was made or acknowledging my previous reversion comments which clearly explain why I edited. Are you deliberately ignoring my reversion comments only a few lines down from your own?) (Tag: Undo)

Strangely, the disagreeing user suggests I use the talk page after I explained my position on their talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Calton#Impossible_Interpretation

00:30, 9 August 2018‎ Calton (talk | contribs)‎ . . (91,800 bytes) (+38)‎ . . (Undid revision 854073661 by 184.101.195.188 (talk) - Assertion by edit summary **IS** "Because I said so". Talk Page: use it.) (Tag: Undo)

Then I get banned. All edits were made in good faith and I provided an explanation.

"Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest " wasn't an attack against you, it was an allusion to Trump and plausible deniability on his part. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.