User talk:185.58.55.148

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 185.58.55.148, is registered to tirolnet GmBH, an Internet service provider through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

August 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.58.55.148 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Could you please explain how my comment was "disruptive editing" / "trolling" rather than simply providing a quick reason for blocking me? I simply was quite shocked to find out what was happening and asked a question why does that earn me a block? 185.58.55.148 (talk) 17:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This kind of broad personal attack is not welcome here, and should not be welcome anywhere. You're going to need to address your blatant and rude attack on others there before we address your block. Jayron 32 17:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Jayron32 It is not a personal attack it is simply the statement of my political vietpoint. Please do read my comment below regarding the person who blocked me. Again it is NOT a personal attack in the same way that asking a judge who is biased to recuse themselves would not be a personal attack on that judge.

I think you need to adjust your understanding of how to treat people. Just below, you called someone a "queer BLM China loving person", and if you think that's a "political viewpoint" and not a blatant personal attack, there's nothing I can do for you. Vaya con dios. --Jayron 32 18:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jayron32 I was expressing my political viewpoint about pronouns and the left leaning partisan hacks on Wikipedia and that is why I was blocked. I simply said that the person who blocked me (akin to a judge) was biased and unsuited to block me because they are so called "queer" and like BLM which clearly means they are against people who don't love that kind of ideology. Ok well this is discrimination based on political views. The person who blocked me is a "queer" "BLM" China loving person so of course they would like to silence my views based on political opinion.

You are blocked for making personal attacks, and with that comment you just dug yourself deeper. Nice going. You earned a block extension. Use this talk page to make an unblock request. Continuing with the attacks will result in losing access to this talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So mentioning the attributes that a person exposed on their own talkpage is an attack? I just want to be judged fairly here by someone impartial and neutral, that's all. 185.58.55.148 (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't entitled to express your views here, see WP:FREESPEECH. If your views prevent you from interacting with others in a civil manner without personal attacks, there is no place for you here. This is a global community of all types of races, religions, genders, sexuality, and political views who do our best to get along. There are plenty of conservatives here who do get along with us and understand basic human courtesy. Consider if insulting liberals is how you want to go through life instead of trying to get along with other people who just think differently than you. 331dot (talk) 22:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.58.55.148 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I kindly reiterate my request to be unblocked on the basis that my political viewpoints have wrongly been judged by people as personal attacks due to the fact that the same people who blocked me hold differing viewpoints to those which I expressed. I would like an impartial person who is not woke/left wing fanatic. Someone fair and just. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Too bad. You don't get to select which volunteers consider your unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

185.58.55.148 (talk) 20:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.58.55.148 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all I would like to reiterate my arguments above that I have made absolutely no personal attacks and I simply questioned the impartiality of the person who blocked me based on their viewpoints as is not unheard of in real trials. In either case you shouldn't be surprised why Trump has a chance of winning if you keep up this kind of behavior.

Decline reason:

Obviously you're not interested in being taken seriously, so to keep you from further wasting our time (since obviously you don't think your wasting yours), I will revoke your talk page access and extend the block after saving this. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:36, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.