Jump to content

User talk:193.56.36.22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2018

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Doug Weller talk 10:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Karthik (singer)

[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Karthik (singer)), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Babymissfortune 14:29, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Boeing 737 MAX groundings has been reverted.
Your edit here to Boeing 737 MAX groundings was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2tuKiiznsY, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qifT9MBZm0k) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:34, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wrap (food)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wrap (food). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm the person who has made the change for the wrap article Wrap (food). I do not agree with your decision of removing my contribution and your argument of not being constructive, and you do not explain the reasons. It is not fear because wikipedia is made thanks to people and there are several not accurate or not complete articles and you take advantage of this to generate false concepts in the world. If you want to remove changes at least you shold do it with enough arguments.