User talk:216.152.18.132
April 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Spirit of St. Louis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 07:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ophicleide (organ stop), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
[edit]Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Erratum. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Erratum. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:14, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
January 2023
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on U.S. Route 66. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
WDC 65C816
[edit]You have a message over at Talk:WDC 65C816#24-bit claim.
CapnZapp (talk) 20:42, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pipe organ. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Personhumanperson (talk) 15:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Additional comment. I recommend you read about our policies on neutral point of view. Personhumanperson (talk) 15:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]Hello, I'm Binnenstaat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pan Am Flight 6 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Binnenstaat (talk) 00:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |