User talk:2601:648:8300:5F00:9449:E790:6CC:F666

January 2024

Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Huckleberry Hound Show, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Victoria Carroll, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Clarence Nash, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. See WP:SUPERCAT - don't add higher level categories in a category hierarchy when a lower level included category is already in the article Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read the note at the top of the page at Category:Disney people and stop adding that category to articles. Find the proper subcategory and add that if it is missing. For the article you are adding it to a valid subcategory is already in the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Anselmo, you may be blocked from editing. Ignoring messages about adding redundant categories. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are currently engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ward Kimball regarding the Category:Disney people. This means that you are repeatedly changing the content back to how you think it should be although several other editors disagree. You have been informed that your edit is contrary to the standards in WP:CATSPECIFIC. Please note:

Your edit warring is disruptive specially regarding the several reverts you have made;
Your editing is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right;
If you continue to engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 05:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dog City. Materialscientist (talk) 07:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.