User talk:2O19

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2O19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked because according to the blocking admin I created this account to engage in a dispute on a controversial topic area and drag a fairly visible editor in that area to ANI. The blocking admin also stated that If I am not a sockpuppet of someone he’ll eat his hat. I promise that I will never drag DBigXray's name to ANI but please ask him not to censor my comments and I was not harassing DBigXray moreover I think the reverse is true please take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jaggi_Vasudev&action=history you will find who was harassing whom and more comments from my blocking an be found at User_talk:2O19#User:TonyBallioni. Finally I again promise that will never drag DBigXray's name to ANI and If I was harassing DBigXray unknowingly then I am sorry for that. Please Unblock me 2O19 (talk) 18:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So within your first hour on Wikipedia you managed to find AN/I? Not just that, you're familiar in your very first edit with a laundry list of Wikipedia policies, essays, and so on, and use that to criticize another editor? With diff to an edit on that editor's talk page? Sorry if I don't believe you're new. Sorry if I also don't believe you weren't out to harass that other editor to begin with. Huon (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2O19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked ? I did not vandalize any article, I was just discussing an Issue at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Please_help_me what is wrong in discussing ? Is it considered bad on Wikipedia ? Please check my contribution you will not find any thing bad for the Wikipedia. 2O19 (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. An unblock request is not the place to ask for clarification of your block. Looking at your contributions you have a lot of knowledge on how Wikipedia works. Ping the blocking administrator and ask them for clarification. ~ GB fan 17:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi 2O19! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

12:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:TonyBallioni

Hi, User:TonyBallioni can you please tell me what is the specific reason behind my block so that at least I can appeal it.

Warm Regards,

2O19 (talk) 18:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You created an account to engage in a dispute on a controversial topic area and drag a fairly visible editor in that area to ANI. That screams NOTHERE. Additionally if you aren’t a sockpuppet of someone I’ll eat my hat. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TonyBallioni, I am ready to face any sock-puppet test, and the only reason behind dragging his name is that he was reverting my edits at Talk:Jaggi Vasudev SEE https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jaggi_Vasudev&action=history , what else do you expect when it happens ? And thanks for your swift reply. 2O19 (talk) 18:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser is not used to prove innocence and cannot prove a negative: we do not run it on request. Regardless, the main reason for your block is WP:NOTHERE, which as I said, your behaviour demonstrates: this account was created to further a dispute and/or harass a specific editor. You are free to appeal your block, but I’m not lifting it. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]