Jump to content

User talk:5 albert square/Archive9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Please comment on Talk:Jane Austen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jane Austen. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:New pages patrol/RfC for patroller right. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

16:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Route diagram template. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News

Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News

Hello everyone, and welcome to the September 2016 GOCE newsletter.

>>> Sign up for the September Drive, already in progress! <<<

July Drive: The July drive was a roaring success. We set out to remove April, May, and June 2015 from our backlog (our 149 oldest articles), and by 23 July, we were done with those months. We added July 2015 (66 articles) and copy-edited 37 of those. We also handled all of the remaining Requests from June 2016. Well done! Overall, we recorded copy edits to 240 articles by 20 editors, reducing our total backlog to 13 months and 1,656 articles, the second-lowest month-end total ever.

August Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 21 through 27 August; the theme was sports-related articles in honor of the 2016 Summer Olympics. Of the eight editors who signed up, five editors removed 11 articles from the backlog. A quiet blitz – everyone must be on vacation. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

18:04, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Protect user pages by default. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Removal of ID Information

My user name is 7Jim7.

However, at the following history page,

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comma_Johanneum&action=history

my identity is shown as

2601:703:100:6fe0:ca2a:14ff:fe1a:e2f6

at 20:07 and 20:03 for September 7, 2016, because I thought I was logged in, but apparently I wasn’t, when I made an edit to the article (adding an English translation of the Greek).

I don’t know what that identity means, but could you please remove it, if you would, just in case it has personal information regarding my computer.

Thank you.

Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:703:100:6FE0:CA2A:14FF:FE1A:E2F6 (talk) 20:46, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Oops! There it is again.

2601:703:100:6FE0:CA2A:14FF:FE1A:E2F6 (talk) 20:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

And again.

Wait a minute. Let's try this.

7Jim7 (talk) 20:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

That's better.

Hi your IP address is what is used to identify you if you're not logged in. It won't give out any personal information about you. What it will tell us is which network you are on and whereabouts in the world (roughly) you are editing from which will be based on the server information provided by your network. That's really about it.
Would you like me to see if your edit still qualifies? 5 albert square (talk) 02:11, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
An IP address is personal enough that I don’t want it to be shown. I was hoping that you could remove it, if you would, from that history page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comma_Johanneum&action=history
Whatever that number (2601:703:100:6fe0:ca2a:14ff:fe1a:e2f6) is at 20:03 and 20:07 on 7 September 2016 on that history page, it doesn’t look like and IP address to me.
Two days earlier (08:42, 5 September 2016) on that same history page, someone else did an edit, leaving a number (83.215.129.87) as an identifier. Now, that looks like an IP address to me.
Whatever that number (2601:703:100:6fe0:ca2a:14ff:fe1a:e2f6) is, I’m asking for it to be removed from that history page, if you would. 7Jim7 (talk) 04:08, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
PS: The edit that I performed on that article appears to be OK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7Jim7 (talkcontribs) 04:11, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, it really is just your IP address. Nothing to be concerned about. But I have deleted it for you. 5 albert square (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

22:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, 5 albert square. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

An article for speedy deletion

I marked Geeksters for speedy deletion for not having any references. If you can delete it. That would help Wikipedia. I also think it spams links to external websites. Thanks Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 19:18, 26 September 2016 (UTC)