User talk:71.68.129.162
March 2023
[edit]Hello, I'm Moops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Sony Pictures Television programs have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops ⋠T⋡ 01:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- I was straightening things out until you reverted them. 71.68.129.162 (talk)
- Try again then. It looked like you were deliberately introducing a typo. TY — Moops ⋠T⋡ 01:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- There is a difference between introducing a typo from correcting a mistake. You will also have to undo what you did. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 23:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Actually Moops never actually reverted it, in fact it was you who had done it. 62.254.11.73 (talk) 10:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Because the user took to long to do so. You are awfully late. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- If you are also using your response to attack people, please stop. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 14:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- That user didn't say that he is gonna attack you and not to mention that Moops was blocked. Didn't you know that already?85.255.234.215 (talk) 12:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- No. And this would go for the same thing to you too. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 16:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Gilliam:Could you please handle this IP user 85.255.234.215? 71.68.129.162 (talk) 16:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- No. And this would go for the same thing to you too. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 16:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- That user didn't say that he is gonna attack you and not to mention that Moops was blocked. Didn't you know that already?85.255.234.215 (talk) 12:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Actually Moops never actually reverted it, in fact it was you who had done it. 62.254.11.73 (talk) 10:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- There is a difference between introducing a typo from correcting a mistake. You will also have to undo what you did. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 23:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Try again then. It looked like you were deliberately introducing a typo. TY — Moops ⋠T⋡ 01:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Stop with this now! The IP user 85.255.234.215 is innocent all along and you didn't even know why Moops was blocked. 85.255.233.126 (talk) 06:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- I will see to it that you get blocked for attacking IP users. Moops is a sockpuppet according to the search. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
@EdJohnston: 71.68.129.162 (talk) 21:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit]Please stop removing sourced content. If you do this again just like you did at List of NBCUniversal television programs you will be blocked from editing. You're the one who was removing sourced content for no reason. You wanted the IPs blocked but you never do that at all. 85.255.237.138 (talk) 15:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Wait until someone blocks you for removing sourced content for no reason at List of NBCUniversal television programs. 85.255.237.138 (talk) 15:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm starting to notice something with the same person. This above person must be the same person from several years ago that I remember who kept changing his IP addresses for edit warring. King Shadeed (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
I told you stop removing sourced content from the List of NBCUniversal television programs. That IP is completely unrelated to the same person you were looking for! 85.255.235.172 (talk) 16:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- In fact you wanted to block innocent IP users even though they added reliable sources on most articles but you never did it anyway. 85.255.235.172 (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Would you please not remove "continued from" for some reason? 148.252.133.74 (talk) 22:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- No. It is too jarring. There is no need to include it if another studio is producing it within the same company. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 22:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yes. And you better stop because it's not jarring. 148.252.133.74 (talk) 22:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Not just that, but it's also you wanted to remove content for some reasons. 148.252.133.74 (talk) 22:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Why are you keep doing this? You're an IP user, tell me why!. RESPOND TO ME OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES! 148.252.133.74 (talk) 22:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
June 2023
[edit]Please stop reverting someone edits. You need to stop it for once, you're an IP user don't do this! 148.252.132.122 (talk) 21:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- And you're not an IP user? Have a nice day. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes the other IP IS an IP user. 85.255.233.168 (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- If this is the same person behind those other two IPs: 148.252.132.122 and 85.255.233.168, please stop. Because whenever this IP user is undoing changes at specific pages, you keep attacking him. There are rules and regulations here at Wikipedia shown here. King Shadeed (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- King Shadeed, what are you saying to this IP user? 85.255.233.168 (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'm including you as well in case you haven't paid attention. The both of you (or just you) need to stop going after that IP user all because he or she corrects the info at any Wikipedia articles. King Shadeed (talk) 15:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Why didn't you did at another IP user's talk page earlier? 85.255.233.169 (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'm including you as well in case you haven't paid attention. The both of you (or just you) need to stop going after that IP user all because he or she corrects the info at any Wikipedia articles. King Shadeed (talk) 15:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- King Shadeed, what are you saying to this IP user? 85.255.233.168 (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- If this is the same person behind those other two IPs: 148.252.132.122 and 85.255.233.168, please stop. Because whenever this IP user is undoing changes at specific pages, you keep attacking him. There are rules and regulations here at Wikipedia shown here. King Shadeed (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes the other IP IS an IP user. 85.255.233.168 (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
September 2023
[edit]One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- What is this about? 71.68.129.162 (talk) 14:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- The Wikipedia content reads
- On December 8, 2022, Sony signed a deal with Crave as part of a Pay-One window licensing agreement, the two companies have entered a long-term deal, kickstarting April 2023.
- The content at [1] reads
- As part of a Pay-One window licensing agreement, the two companies have entered a long-term deal, kickstarting April 2023.
- The sentence which you've restored twice appears to have been copied verbatim. Would you like to remove or rewrite the sentence in question? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes. If you knew that all along, then why didn't you change that in the first place instead of you removing it?
- The standard action when finding a copyright violation is to remove it, and then request it be permanently rev/deleted. Not to restore said content twice and then question the editor who deleted it. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's not the question. The better thing to do is replacing it rather than removing it altogether. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 23:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have removed it. Please consider re-writing it yourself. — Diannaa (talk) 00:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's pointless because I am not who provided it. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 18:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- I have removed it. Please consider re-writing it yourself. — Diannaa (talk) 00:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's not the question. The better thing to do is replacing it rather than removing it altogether. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 23:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- The standard action when finding a copyright violation is to remove it, and then request it be permanently rev/deleted. Not to restore said content twice and then question the editor who deleted it. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit]I cannot belive why you're trying to replace "continued from" with "produced by". This irrates most users and had to switched back to it. 148.252.159.156 (talk) 08:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot believe why you're vandalizing with the same nonsense again. 71.68.129.162 (talk) 17:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |