User talk:89.206.112.11/Archives/ 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:89.206.112.11. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

AfC notification: Draft:Martin Müller (geographer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Martin Müller (geographer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 12:45, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Müller (geographer) (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject appears notable but the sourcing is heavily dependent on the subject's own writings (two thirds of the citations are his works, though some citations are repeated), not drawing on coverage about him or his work by independent reliable sources (see WP:RS). Two entire sections (education and career, Recognition and awards) have no citations at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Müller (geographer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Martin Müller (geographer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 18:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, 89.206.112.11! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paul W (talk) 18:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

January 2023

Hi 89.206.112.11! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Felidae several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Felidae, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2023

Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Expansion of the universe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 10:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.