Jump to content

User talk:90.211.100.24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without an account, your IP address (90.211.100.24) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Ueutyi (talk) 19:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Wiae. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Landau Forte Academy Amington— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wiae /tlk 19:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If you have further concerns that this does not meet WP:GNG, then please consider AfD rather than reverting. Reverting should only be used when it is unopposed. She doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:MUSICBIO yet, but she does meet WP:GNG. WP:BASIC makes it most clear: People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability. There is little doubt from glancing at the article's references that she meets this, with articles about her in many national newspapers and magazines, and for more than one event. Boleyn (talk) 20:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm H.dryad. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lydia Lucy has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. H.dryad (talk) 20:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If this happens again, I will report you for edit warring. Boleyn (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! 90.211.100.24, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! H.dryad (talk) 21:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


April 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:Brendan O'Carroll and wife.jpeg, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Majora (talk) 02:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Jennifer_Gibney, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 18:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 19:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm JJMC89. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chloe Jasmine, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:16, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]