User talk:99.126.127.19

May 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pine Tree Flag. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Maybe you should read the talk page before getting uppity and posting on my page, accusing me of being disruptive. Drmies

99.126.127.19 (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Stelter, you may be blocked from editing. Wiiformii (talk) 01:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

quit using a bot 99.126.127.19 (talk) 01:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Brian Stelter. Wiiformii (talk) 01:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Brian Stelter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wiiformii (talk) 01:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you are a bot and have no say 99.126.127.19 (talk) 01:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the bot? Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources on how to cite your claims, and with proper claims titles such as that are okay. Wiiformii (talk) 01:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright 99.126.127.19 (talk) 01:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

99.126.127.19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Everything I said was sourced and true. Go ahead and show me what was incorrect.99.126.127.19 (talk) 02:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You aren't blocked for posting incorrect information. You are blocked for posting poorly sourced information, such as this. You cannot use Wikipedia to cite other Wikipedia articles, see WP:CIRCULAR. If you have independent reliable sources that discuss the length of someone's Wikipedia article, then you might have something. Based on your edits you seem to just be here to criticize the individual you wrote about- you can do that on social media all you wish, that's considered WP:NOTHERE here. 331dot (talk) 07:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 23:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.