User talk:ABHINAV1498

May 2020

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vikramaditya, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Suhaldev, you may be blocked from editing. Please note that the article discusses the different groups that have claimed that the individual was part of their group. Your change to the article goes against that sourced information. bonadea contributions talk 16:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Malhar Rao Holkar. xRENEGADEx 19:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by XRENEGADEx (talk • contribs)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Defining the details with the proper evidence and source documents

If I edit or publish some thing with supporting documents then how any one can block me and report me ABHINAV1498 (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Your recent editing history at Prithviraj Chauhan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. utcursch | talk 18:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear that you are here to only promote an agenda and have no interest in editing collaboratively, if this continues, then your editing privileges will be revoked completely. —SpacemanSpiff 18:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:ABHINAV1498 reported by User:Pablomartinez (Result: ). Thank you. PabloMartinez (talk) 18:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 18:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]