User talk:AJ9/July–December 2013 Archive

Done the lead

I have done the lead for Outstanding Supporting Actress, you can now make some adjustments now. I would hate if sound pushy its because I'm going on vacation in two weeks and I dont know if I will be able to acess in the internet. Therefore, I believe we should nominate it before I leave. Thanks for the congrats and the barnstars! You are such a sweetheart! :)SoapFan12 10:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll tweak the lead now. No worries, we'll have it nominated before then. It's really no problem, thankyou for your fine contributions to these lists. I am noticing in the lead something written about confusion surrounding the lead actress. I'm removing it, as it doesn't matter if the supporting actress and lead actress are the same age, as long as they are above 25. It depends on their script capacity, not age, as I've gathered. Ar re 12:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

" The criteria was later altered, requiring that the actress be aged 25 or below" - did you mean to say, requiring that the actress be aged 25 or above?? Ar re 12:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I meant the criteria of Outstanding Younger Actress but what you wrote makes more sense because the article is about SA. SoapFan12 12:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused... what does lead actress have to do with this? Also, was the criteria for this award altered too? Ar re 13:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so critics were confused why Younger Actress was introduced, some people thought they were lead and supporting standars. Lead Actress does not have to do with anything, I meant that some actresses that were nominated for YA had the same or simillar ages as someone who was nominated for lead and supporting. I guess this award was altered too, because when the rules change for YA, the criteria for SA had to changed too. Do you get me now? SoapFan12 13:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm I think it best to leave Lead Actress out of this and just focus on the comparison between Younger and Supporting, because that's where the confusion was. Yes, but is there a source claiming that it was changed?Ar re 13:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. I don't think there's a source, however its should be logical to readers since if YA is below 25 years old for supporting actress you will to be 26 years old and above. Like if a Younger Actress has reached 26, they can compete for the aldult categories. SoapFan12 13:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

True. I guess it should be mentioned then. Ar re 13:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to add that info, or I will? SoapFan12 13:32, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the info. Can you make some adjustments please? SoapFan12 13:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I beleive after this is fixed, we should nominate it for FL? SoapFan12 14:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just made slight adjustments there was no problems. Sure, we can co nominate - can I just give it a final check first ? Ar re 14:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was just wondering. You're excellent at finding sources. Would you be willing to help with the sourcing of another list/award type article? Although, it isn't soap related. Ar re 14:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not. What article is it? SoapFan12 15:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have added the nomination, the link is the following: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series/archive1. If you would like you can add more reasons why it should become an FL. Also, I know you have a great user friend (Creativity97), can you ask this user if she would be interested in giving comments. SoapFan12 15:59, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It will be great, if you can add more reasons on why it should become an FL. Also, I love you're contributions on Supporting Actress, you are a fantastic editors. Once of these days, you should teach me you're tricks. ahaha SoapFan12 00:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will do soon. Right now I'm doing a GA review. Aw thanks haha I'm not that good Lol. Ar re 01:20, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, can you still tell me what is the article, that you would like that I contribute at finding source? SoapFan12 01:46, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's for List of accolades received by Jennifer Lopez. Needs more sources. Do u think you could look for a few? Don't have to source all, just a few if you could. It would be greatly appreciated it. I want to work on it later but It would be helpful to have a few sources :) Ar re 02:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry, But while editing, I found that I am not really interested on doing something not related to soaps. However, I'll try looking at it later. SoapFan12 03:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also have you talked to Creativity97? If she would be interested on greviewing SA? If you hadn't time, I totally understand. There is no need to rush. :) Again, I am so sorry about the List of accolades received by Jennifer Lopez. You have done so much for me, I should be helping you with that list. If you need anything soap-related, I would love to help you! SoapFan12 03:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC) :)[reply]

It's okay I'm not that desperate, it's no huge issue. I'll ask Creativity97 if he can review. I still owe him a review/a few comments at a peer review, so I want to do that first before asking him. Ar re 05:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Well, if you need anything soap-related, please contact me, I owe you so much! Do you know what the reviewer meant by "tables are not closed"? Furthermore, I removed the images that the reviewer has request that are copyvios. SoapFan12 11:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ref found!!!!

Guess what?! I found a source that shows, I'm right!!!!! That to be eligible to be nominated for Outstanding Younger Actor/Actress you must be 25 or below. It is the following : http://www.emmyonline.org/applications/33rd_daytime_forms/daytime_rulebook_05-06.pdf. (page 16) Plus, I already added the ref to Younger Acotr/actress and supporting actress. SoapFan12 12:12, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The ref is outdated, it's from eight years ago. But I suppose it will do for now. But IMO it doesn't prove anything about supporting actress. I'm still a little confused myself. As of now, is there proof that the supporting actress category warrants the person to be above 25?Ar re 12:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I just found another ref, from 2012, I will add it soon. Well, don't you think it should be logical to readers? You can nominate you're self for supporting or lead when you reached 26 years old, because you must 25 years old to be in younger categories. SoapFan12 12:28, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is logical but it needs to be sourced. What is the source you found? I'll see if I can find a source about the age rules for supporting roles. Ar re 12:35, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the source that I found : http://www.daytimeemmys.tv/oda/servlet/fileOpenStatus?file=2012%20Rules%20and%20Procedures__0.5341665351582674.pdf&fileOpenType=view. For Younger Actor/Actress. SoapFan12 12:41, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It still doesn't tell us anything about supporting actress. IMO, the confusion regarding BM and TE.B, was mainly regarding younger actress. I don't think it needs to be mentioned here. The age of the character is irrelevant to the awards, the only thing that counts is the age of the actress. Maybe we could just write "The criteria for this award was altered upon the introduction of [Younger Actress], requiring an actress to be age 26 or above to be eligible in this category", or something. Judging by Judi Evans win in '84, this was the case. Do you want me to change it, or u?Ar re 12:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can change it, because it was you're idea. Plus, you are right, it makes more sense. I am very happy to work with an smart person like you. :) SoapFan12 12:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lol thanks, but I'm not that smart. Btw, just changed it. What do you think?Ar re 12:59, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, The changes looks great. But, it feels a bit too short, like that it needs expanding. However, what other informations could there be? I looks for some, but can't find some. Can you try? Or Maybe, we should just leave as it is. What do you think? SoapFan12 13:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On a different subject, I've started a new discussion at Talk:Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series (about the hatnotes). I would love for you to contribute your opinion. SoapFan12 00:12, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Actress

I've got a great information to add for Lead Actress, but I don't know how to use it, plus it need re-wording it goes like this: In 2002, when the presenters announced Susan Flannery's name the "Flannery" part was unintelligible to those in the control booth, who started to play the "All My Children" theme music and cut to a shot of actress Susan Lucci having a conversation backstage. The camera stayed on the shocked Lucci as Rosie O'Donnell, hearing the music, told her to go on stage. The camera then cut as Susan Flannery made it up the stairs to accept the award and Lucci returned backstage. Producer 'Dick Clark' apologized for the mistake the following day.. If you could re-worded to make shorter. That would be great! What do you think? Is it needed? SoapFan12 11:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes for Supporting Actress

Hey Arre 9,

Its a funny story, but my mouse could break down any time, so can you please finish the fixes for SA? I finished the rowscopes and colscopes. However, I'm not done with "the city where the work was published", I started a bit (done the lead part, started a bit on section: winners and nominees (1979 & 1980 - I did only. ) Thanks in advance. SoapFan12 10:11, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've continue a bit, but dunno if I did it right lol. Btw, if you have receive this message, I would rather be responded than to be ignore. Don't want sound pushy, but I would like to be help with the location for the references. SoapFan12 00:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, yesterday was my birthday and I was a little busy. Yup I'll be happy to. Ar re 01:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tbh, I'm really unsure as the why we were asked to add locations, I never thought that was compulsory. Have you been doing this in the past for the other lists? Ar re 01:22, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its okay! Happy be-lated birthday

! I hope you had great time! I haven't been doing this on the other lists, maybe you should contact them, and question them about this. SoapFan12 01:29, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, yes it was great.Nvm, we'll do them anyway. Nonetheless, don't edit the article right now, I am doing some locations. So we don't end up in edit conflicts, ok? Ar re 01:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dont woory! :) SoapFan12 01:42, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice edits for SA! How did you found the location? Because if you wish, I'll try doing the rest of in the later of the day, or do you want to do the rest? Or are you done ? SoapFan12 13:44, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can get the locations but just looking at the newspaper's wiki article. If there is none, open up the google archive link and check on the actual newspaper (it usually says) what the area is. I'll try to do some more 2moro.Right now, it's 11:46PM and my brain is turning off, aha. Ar re 13:47, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks. When they are multiple locations, do you put them both? SoapFan12 13:02, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nvm. I finish the locations, can you please check if I did them correctly? SoapFan12 20:13, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. THankyou! Sorry, I was gonna finish them off. Ar re 02:42, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Parker (2013 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'Parker' Cast List|url=http://movies.about.com/od/parker/a/cast-list.htm|publisher=[[About.com]] ([[The New York Times Company]]|accessdate=January 24, 2013}}</ref>
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.amazon.com/Parker-Blu-ray-Jason-Statham/dp/B005LAIIM6 |title=Parker [Blu-ray]: Jason Stratham, Jennifer Lopez, Michael Chiklis, Patti LuPone, Clifton Collins Jr.,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

The Kindness Barnstar

This is for you being so kind and nice to users, especially to me. You were the first user that welcome me nicely and treat me so kindly. Thank you! You go to the extra mile to be nice, without being asked. You are a great partner, and I am so happy that we got to work on the list Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series together! I hope we could do it again! Great work! Again, thanks for being one of nicest users I've met! You truly deserved this barnstar!

SoapFan12 17:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awww that's so sweet of you. Thankyou so much :) That means a lot, it's all my pleasure. Ar re 17:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. You deserve it! SoapFan12 19:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting Actor

I've been hesitant to ask you this, since you always do something for me and I never return the favor. But, would you be iterested on doing some modifications on the lead for Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series? If not, I completely understand! SoapFan12 00:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll have a look soon :) Ar re 03:55, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) SoapFan12 04:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, A reviewer gives us comments, I have fixed them all. Only the sixth ("Total awards won" should be more like "Series with most awards") comment, I'm not sure about, so I changed to Series with most awards. What do you think? Does it need another name, or should we leave it alone?

Keep an eyer

Hey there, I was wondering if you can keep an eye on Bill Spencer, Jr. and Katie Logan articles? Since this user keeps adding the 2013, when Bill and Katie are legally married. Another user and I told him once to stop adding it and that they are not divorce, when it hasn't been finalized yet. SoapFan12 11:26, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AJ9. You have new messages at Creativity97's talk page.
Message added 17:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Creativity97 17:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We did it!

Guess what? Arre, we did it! Supporting Actress became a Featured List! Yay, now we just need the bot to make it official! I am so glad that we got to work together! It you're first featured list accomplishment! Congrats! SoapFan12 22:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aww this is great news

Congrats to u too! Ar re 07:43, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, AJ9. You have new messages at Creativity97's talk page.
Message added 18:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Creativity97 18:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Forrester

Hi AJ9, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article Taylor Forrester. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thanks so much! That's so great of you.Ar re

No worries; Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AJ9. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Taylor Forrester at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Hey there, I was wanting to point out that I'm very hurt since, I've asked you if you would be willing to help me with Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series and you have responded yes (which I am very grateful). However, another user asked you for help and you did it right away. Can you please explain me this? I would like to understand, why you chose to help that user before me, since I asked you first. SoapFan12 00:20, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No need to be hurt... I will try to make some tweaks later. Are you talking about my work with Creativity on Genevieve Atkinson? or something else? Because that was only because I had an intention for months to work on that article. I'm not that organized on Wikipedia & kinda picky. I only edit what I feel like at that moment. I'm not really a list-type person, but I'll gladly try and help you asap. Sorry if you saw it that way. Ar re 06:37, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is you're work with Creativity on Genevieve Atkinson. But I understand, I am like that too (I only edit what I feel like at that moment) You don't need to help me ASAP, I just kind feel a bit left out or betrayed when it happens but that my problem. Its okay and there is nothing to forvgive, my reaction to this was irresponsible and I'm very sorry. SoapFan12 10:53, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Genevieve Atkinson.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Genevieve Atkinson.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:49, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking/Underlinking

Hey there, I was wondering if you can you're imput for my FLC about Overlinking/Underlinking (a reviewer needs other people to give their opinions)? I would love to hear, what you need to say. SoapFan12 Talk page here 23:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry I had to disagree. Ar re 01:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, AJ9. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 06:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

— Statυs (talk, contribs) 06:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Y&R

Hey Arre, Y&R has been awful so far....I thought JG said he would of rebuild Sharon, and Phyllis falling down the stairs is ridiculous, but in a way, Sharon did not push her, Phyllis fell back while she was trying to take her phone back. Also, did you hear the rumors about, Avery and Nick's wedding? Appenrently, it will be a big wedding and Sharon will threat everyone with a gun. I hope not! SoapFan12 Talk page here 00:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yea I'm really sick of Y&R. JG really does lack creativity. He cannot write long-term stories. I really am disappointed in him considering he used to be sooo good before. Yes I heard something about that. Lol, what a joke. Just another reason I cbf watching this stupid show. Ar re 05:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is terrible now. But you have to admit, B&B is getting better and as usual Days & GH are awesome. SoapFan12 Talk page here

09:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Idk if I told you but I don't watch B&B anymore. Stephanie, Ridge, Taylor are all gone & Steffy is recurring? No thanks! Lol. I stopped watching when Taylor left and they didn't even give her a good exit. GH is great, I just don't like RH as Franco....trying to, but still don't. DAYS ofc is the only reliable soap opera.Ar re 10:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should watch B&B (it is still boring without Steffy and Taylor) however I am liking Katie now and there are some great storylines except the Hope and Liam love affair. 100% my thougths, hate RH as Franco. SoapFan12 Talk page here

10:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, how do we write a guy? I mean is it, men or man? Sorry, if that sounds childish, but my first language isn't English. lolSoapFan12 Talk page here

10:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genevieve Atkinson

Hello Arre. Just wondering where we stand on this article. I've condensed and rewritten the storyline section; I feel the article is good to go. If you feel the same way, could you please co-nominate the article for GA? Also, I've created an article for Fenmore Baldwin. What do you think? I can't find any good images of him though. Do you think you could look for some if you get a chance? Creativity97 02:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. The Fen article is good, there is some nice reception material there. I'll see if I can get an image.Ar re 06:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, with the Fen article, I recommend if you were still looking for a DYK?, you should enter that :) Ar re 12:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the image! I really like it. What should I enter for a DYK for Fen? I can't think of anything interesting that I added. I see you didn't co-nom Genevieve yet; no rush, do you want to make any further adjustments? Creativity97 16:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated Fen's article for a DYK, I used "...that Max Ehrich listens to the music of John Mayer and Bruno Mars to get into the head space of his character, Fenmore Baldwin, on The Young and the Restless?" Also, I just wanted to know if you're done making any further adjustments to Genevieve. I really don't want to rush you, but if you're done, I could co-nominate the article for GA? I just need you to give me an okay. Creativity97 04:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay. I've nominated it now. You're welcome for the image...I added a new one for Genevieve, it came out better than the last 1 finally. Is it ok? I think the DYK hook is ok, although have you thought of any others? Ar re 06:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like the new Genevieve image. And no, that was the only DYK hook for Fen that I could think of. You're welcome to look for any more and let me know? Also, I'll see if BrickHouse is available to review Genevieve. Creativity97 16:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait nvm I actually think that is a good hook, at first I didn't think it related to anything but now it makes sense because Fen is kinda messed up and obsessive lol. Ar re 12:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey Arre, I have notice that Livelikemusic has comeback, me and him has not gone off great start previously but I was wondering if you give a good word for me, like that I have changed from the disdruptive editor. Also, can you please tell when we are going to work on supporting actor for daytime emmys? — SoapFan12 ^Talk 11:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'd love to put in a good word for you but I personally feel that it's something you should do yourself, and the editor would definitely find you more sincere if you apologized yourself.. I'll try and have a look tomorrow at the supporting actor list... but I don't really feel like taking that to FL status with you. I'm not really interested in working on anymore lists, that's really your project, so you should go ahead :). I'll help with the lead if you would like. Ar re 12:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks! The lead would be perfect for the supporting actor list. Okay, I really understand. — SoapFan12 ^Talk

12:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Genevieve Atkinson

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Genevieve Atkinson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of BrickHouse337 -- BrickHouse337 (talk) 21:07, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have conducted the review and passed the article now. Congrats on your great work. Also, I think it would mean a lot to C97 if you as a fellow editor gave them a barnstar, instead of me giving them out. Just a suggestion, your choice. Cheers, --Brick House 337 21:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou very much. Sorry I'm unclear, what do you mean about a barnstar? :) Ar re 03:54, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations Arre, for getting the accolade on this article! It truly is a great one!!! I'm so happy Genevieve is living on in these pages at least! :) Yoryla (talk) 13:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Yoryla, that's nice of you to say. Creativity97 also has done a lot of extensive work for the article, too :) Ar re 13:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant about the barnstar is I'm sure C97 would appreciate receiving a barnstar from you (as a fellow editor) congratulating them on their achievement, rather than me giving them one, as I'm just a GA reviewer and I just thought it might be better for you to deliver one. But that of course is your choice, it was just a suggestion. Cheers, --Brick House 337 21:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK - Steffy Forrester

I have a great DYK for Steffy article. But I was wondering how do you create a DYK, I am not familiar with it, unless you could do it for me? — SoapFan12 ^Talk 12:12, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, the Steffy article is not eligible for DYK?. If u want to familiarize yourself with it, you can read here. Ar re 12:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really, I can't user that : ″B&B was Jacqueline MacInnes Wood first audition in Los Angeles″ ? — SoapFan12 ^Talk

13:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the article did fit the criteria for eligibility for DYK, then yes you could use anything, but Steffy isn't and can't be. You should do some reading up on it, just for a better understanding.Ar re 13:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks! — SoapFan12 ^Talk

13:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was just wanted to say, Congrats on GA articles!!! OMG! The Genevieve article is amazing! Also, Britt's is too! You should give me some pointers! lol — SoapFan12 ^Talk

13:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aw thanks that's so kind of you :) Ar re 13:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, I don't want to be persistance or annoying but you said you would take a look at the lead of Supporting Actor today but like you said you are not interested it, so would please answer with No or Yes. I don't care, but I would love just for you to correct the grammar and spelling mistakes of that list. — SoapFan12 ^Talk

13:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I have it covered. Thanks! — SoapFan12 ^Talk

18:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh.. that's a shame I was still going to do it for you. Nevermind then. Don't misinterpret this, but, why are you in a bit of a hurry to get all of these lists to featured so soon? They aren't going anywhere ;) Great work, regardless.Ar re 11:31, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay. Sorry. :( Its because school is starting in September, and I won't be on wikipedia this often, well I think, when I will be on I will be doing major edits. Also, the user that I've asked forgiveness has edit his talk page multiple times after I wrote on it, and I am currently waiting for him to answer but you know what I think I should be patient. Well, I am, but I am just too curious why he has not answer me back. — SoapFan12 ^Talk

11:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, no need to be sorry. I get it :) are you in high-school or college? Btw, who are you talking about when you refer to 'the user'? which user? Is everything ok?Ar re 11:44, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not freak out, but I am in high-school. The user Livelikemusic. Remember, before I was being one of the most disruptive editors, and that affected you, Creativity97 and him. When I kept uploading new images of Sharon, you told me to stop but I kept doing it and other disruptive edits. lol Btw, I god Lead Actress to FL status, my fourth one! YAY, I am so happy. — SoapFan12 ^Talk

11:49, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I remember. That's nice to hear, congrats

Ar re 17:08, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Now, I just nominated Lead Actor, I know I should not asked but if you do not mind giving comments, it will be great. But, you do not need to do it at all. — SoapFan12 ^Talk

20:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tbh right now I'm not really intent on commenting. I'll try and do it later. But I will tell you here that I've read the lead and there are a few minor wording issues. Ar re 03:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I completely understand. Also, about those minor issues, is it possible you can tell me those issues now? — SoapFan12 ^Talk

03:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Britt Westbourne

On 3 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Britt Westbourne, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that actress Kelly Thiebaud, known for her role as the antagonistic Britt Westbourne on General Hospital, previously appeared in music videos for French disc jockey David Guetta? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Britt Westbourne. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Alex Shih(talk) 08:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Issues

About those minor issues for Lead Actor, would you please tell me them so they can be resolved or please put on the nomination page! It will be greatly apprecitated. Thank you! — SoapFan12 ^Talk 04:00, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the best at grammar either but. Here are tiny things I feel should be altered:

"The award is given to honor an actor who has delivered an outstanding performance in a leading role while working within the daytime drama industry." - maybe "The award is presented in honor of an..."
"Doug Davidson is the 2013 recipient of this award, for his portrayal of Paul Williams on The Young and the Restless; the soap opera and General Hospital are the shows with the most awarded actors, with a total of eight." - this is a bit awkwardly worded. Maybe "Doug Davidson is the 2013 recipient of this award, for his portrayal of Paul Williams on The Young and the Restless, the soap opera that shares the number of most awarded actors with General Hospital, with a total of eight wins". Idk, If it's just me or.
"in 2008, Anthony Geary became the actor with the most wins in the category when he won a sixth time, surpassing David Canary previous record of five; Geary went on to win again in 2012, ultimately receiving seven wins." - a bit long, try and find another way to word this.

That's basically It, I think. The list is great, :) btw thanks for supporting the way I formatted the GH cast members list, unfortunately some people don't like things to be neater. :/ Ar re 04:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]