User talk:ALfd495

ALfd495, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ALfd495! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean Marie Le Bris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for mentioning this. I didn't realize I was pointing toward an homonymic page that... was not the one intended! Thanks for fixing the link. ALfd495 (talk) 23:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Electrification improvements

Hi there. Thanks for your addition of an EoE section to Electrification. I thought it was an excellently-worded summary of very important aspects that the article should cover. Unfortunately, I see it was reverted by another person because of sourcing concerns. When I can (I'm really busy for the next couple of days), I'd like to work with you on finding stronger sourcing and get consensus for including the content. Please don't be discouraged. Did you understand what Fountains of Bryn Mawr‎ was saying about needing secondary sources? Best wishes, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 05:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello there: NREL is a pretty strong primary source. They're experts on the matter. I could add mentions to USDOE (e.g., https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-10/ICF%20-%20DOE%20GRIP%20Program%20Webinar%20Presentation_0.pdf) or individual research papers (e.g., https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40518-021-00176-6)... ALfd495 (talk) 17:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

The research paper you mentioned, Resilience in an Age of Increasing Electrification, would be a great source! It supports the claim that there is a trend towards electrification, although I see it doesn't go as far as to say "Electrify everything". "Electrify everything" is a useful mantra in many ways but of course it's an oversimplification; the scholarly literature I've read tends to say more measured things like "widespread electrification". Wikipedia wants to echo the scholarly literature rather than the mantras, so the language in our articles should be nuanced.

Wikipedia is strange in that it actually prefers secondary sources such as literature reviews over primary sources. (The official explanation is here and for science topics we often refer to this essay.)

In the sustainable energy topic area, my go-to sources are usually IPCC reports, reports from other UN and international bodies, reports by major scientific organizations such as National Academies, IEA reports, university-level textbooks, books published by academic publishers, and review articles in scholarly journals.

Last week I managed to find some other good sources that you might find useful for expanding the Electrification article:

• Status Report on Electrification Policy: Where to Next?, a review article
• Electrification in the Transportation, Buildings, and Industrial Sectors: a Review of Opportunities, Barriers, and Policies
• IPCC AR6

Looking forward to seeing what you add next. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 05:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electric aircraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UAS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited First aerial crossing of the South Atlantic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Louis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Brezhoweb moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Brezhoweb, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Brezhoweb

Hello, ALfd495. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brezhoweb, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Regional airline, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ACY and PHL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 30 January 2024 (UTC)