Jump to content

User talk:APS (Full Auto)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:Votestacking for StarWind Software Inc.

[edit]

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. --Hu12 (talk) 14:49, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's what you think. You think wrong. I've been just talking to people about why they voted this way and saying "thanks" in any case. Did they vote my way or not. Including you. Would appreciate if you'd spend your time on something more creative then you do now. Thanks!

APS (Full Auto) (talk) 15:02, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarWind Software (2nd nomination), is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Msnicki (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'm kind of all new here so I'm not familiar with a lot of things. I did not want to remove anybodys comments. Sorry again!

APS (Full Auto) (talk) 00:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should leave other editors' remarks as-is. To respond, don't thread your comments into the middle of theirs, line-by-line. They have a right to expect that their comment will be left intact, to be read as a whole, in exactly the form they wrote it. To respond, indent one more level with a colon and write a new paragraph AFTER theirs. Hope that helps. Msnicki (talk) 00:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It does indeed! Thank you again! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 00:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you'd like your article to survive, focus on putting the citations into standard form using citation templates, as I explained at the AfD. Arguing about your sources isn't going to help you until you've cleaned them up. You really only need two good sources to establish notability but they need to be good and people need to be able to tell what they are. Very few people are willing to sift through a list of URLs, half of which are primary sources or otherwise useless. Msnicki (talk) 01:29, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my article but I've spent quite a time on it (had a flu and was on a quarantine at my mother's house).

That's the problem as I don't understand what's good source and what is not. If Hui says they are not acceptable then... They are acceptable or not? Or it's just his pure IMHO? APS (Full Auto) (talk) 01:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:RS. Msnicki (talk) 01:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks! Working on new article so far... APS (Full Auto) (talk) 22:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to see an example of how citation templates can be used with quotes, take a look at the Dennis Ritchie article or the history sections in GNU Compiler Collection or Bash (Unix shell). (Edit without saving to see how it was typed.)
As a practical matter, what you need to establish notability for a commercial product on Wikipedia is basically two good sources. They need to be written by someone not connected to the product, they can't just be reprints of press releases or other trivial mentions, and, again as a practical matter for a commercial product, they pretty much have to be traditional print sources, an actual print magazine or newspaper or an actual book. Most editors are skeptical of any source that's only a website.
The depth of coverage also matters a lot. The "gold standard" would be a 1000-word review in a well-known print magazine. (What's special about a review is that they're reporting their thoughts about the product, not what the vendor says or how the vendor says it should be used; that's the essence of notability on WP, the idea that other people took note, that they thought about it and they said something in a reliable publication.) If you can come up with two of those, you've made your case. It goes from there; at the other extreme, if all the mentions are just the product name every time anyone lists all the similar products in that category, you'll never convince anyone. Hope this helps. Good luck! Msnicki (talk) 01:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, please take a look at the page. I've added all the books I've found in Google (surpsisingly there are many more then SWS mention on their page) also these domains don't include each one so I suspect there are others not referenced by Google yet. And with citations. What do you think about the page now? And I think you're right - we realy need to either glue or replace company with the product as product seems to be much more remarkable then company itself. No idea how to do it however... Thank you! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 01:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for StarWind Software

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of StarWind Software. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Hu12 (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've neither closed nor deleted anything. I'm interested to keep the page and I'm working on book citation for it. Sure I'll be happy to participate in deletion review. Thanks! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quotations

[edit]

Adding quotations for every book is not encyclopedic, it is counter-productive and will only convince others you are engaging in promotion. Just add |page=x or |pages=y-z to the cite book template. Yworo (talk) 02:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Understood! I'll keep few primary ones and will remove all others. Thank you! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 02:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And don't worry about the chapters. While there is a |chapter= parameter for cite book, it has a different function, used primarily where each chapter is by a different author. It would not be useful here. Yworo (talk) 02:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, just keeping the pages... Please take a look. Does the page look better now? Thanks! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 02:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, removed all of them and just left two. Does not look good from my poit of view but hope you know what you're doing :) Thank you! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 02:30, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited StarWind Software, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spin-off and SAN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

APS (Full Auto) (talk) 11:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)I absolutely did! Thanks for letting know ;)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Storage Resource Manager, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages EMC and HDS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Open-E (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to StarWind Software has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- intgr [talk] 11:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dully noted! Sorry about that! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 12:08, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nimble Storage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CASL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, APS (Full Auto). Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 08:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Lenovo. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kendall-K1 (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, APS (Full Auto). Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DataCore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HDD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, APS (Full Auto). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, APS (Full Auto). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DataCore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HPE. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gibberish

[edit]

Please review your edits before saving because they don’t seem to make a lot of sense. Please see DataCore as an example. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 07:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK... APS (Full Auto) (talk) 07:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Active Archive Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iron Mountain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, John Browning, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 13:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You was too fast with your revert. I was adding the source :) Please post-pone your edit or at least review it now. Thanks! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 13:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NVM Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TCP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

StorPool Storage

[edit]

First you removed the archiveurls with a false edit summary claiming "link farming" then you removed the "dead" link from which you had earlier removed the archive version. This is not how WP:DEADLINK works. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, revert the edit with a comment. Why come posting here? APS (Full Auto) (talk) 17:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NVM Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TCP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:APS_(Full_Auto)&oldid=1214553295"