User talk:AWall1998

Continued promotion and abuse of multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for creating multiple accounts and disruption through the use of Wikipedia for promotion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to blocking User:TheWall65 and changing the block rationale at User:Porter Press International, both of which are Confirmed to be your accounts, I've also deleted and locked Porter Press International which you continue to create to circumvent the draft process at Draft:Porter Press International. If you continue to create new accounts or use this account for further promotion once the block expires you will be blocked indefinitely. Please read WP:PAID and adhere to the requirements therein.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, all understood

Your submission at Articles for creation: Porter Press International (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Porter Press International and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Porter Press International, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AWall1998! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AWall1998 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for editing a draft? AWall1998 (talk) 13:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:41, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked because you have been repeatedly told about Wikipedia's rules on writing about your own company (both here and by email), you agreed that you understood what you had been told, and then you continued in exactly the same vein as soon as the block expired. It is abundantly clear now that your sole purpose here is to get an article about your company on Wikipedia; you evidently have no interest in improving the encyclopedia beyond what it takes to further your own cause. Wikipedia does not need contributors who are not interested in building an encyclopedia. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:52, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Porter Press International

Hello, AWall1998. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Porter Press International".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]