User talk:Adrianopolitan378

This is Adrianopolitan378's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This decline is unusual in that the subject of this article is inarguably notable and warrants an article. However, the failure to address the third person in the draft's name, Asclepiodotus, gave me pause to more thoroughly review this article. There are severe neutrality issues. Please rewrite in accordance with that policy. I can provide guidance if requested.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adrianopolitan378! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 00:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'll try my hand at helping later today

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 15:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 14:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can yo not change the map of the Byzantine empire

Don’t do that. Also why is the new map you put for the Komnenos dynasty black and white? 47.204.53.161 (talk) 02:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will do so if it becomes accurate and matches the other maps made of that time period. The territorial extent of the Seljuk Sultanate depicted on the current map defies historical sources and doesn't match the other map on that wiki page. NeimWiki's previous version was way more accurate, this one is wrong and misleading!

Unless a more accurate map is added that resembles the other map on that page , I have no intention of stopping! Adrianopolitan378 (talk) 02:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adrianopolitan378 Don't you love it when pussies hide behind an anonymous IP? Anyway I was passing by to thank you for your edits related to the Law school of Berytus. Cheers! el.ziade (talkallam) 12:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anatolic Theme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hisar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople

Hello, Adrianopolitan378. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Mark the Evangelist appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Phocas, Bishop of Sinope did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! tgeorgescu (talk) 23:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 03:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! tgeorgescu (talk) 09:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bithynia, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treaty of Devol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople

Hello, Adrianopolitan378. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Maximus and Theodotus of Adrianople".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mark the Evangelist seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]