User talk:Alden Loveshade/Archive 1 2008 01 to 2012 01

Welcome

Hello, Alden Loveshade! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Rd232 ^talk 10:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Middlefaire

The article Middlefaire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable event; does not meet the general notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:59, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for giving me this notice. I knew I was coming back in a few hours to work on the article, but of course neither you nor anyone else would know that I was going to follow through. I've added more information and five different sources including The Dallas Morning News which is one of the 20th largest newspapers in America, at least according to Wikipedia. :-) I know the article's still a stub, but hopefully I have enough there to keep it up until it can be expanded. As you suggested that I could remove the tag if I thought the problem was corrected, I am doing so. If I'm in error please let me know. Alden Loveshade (talk) 04:29, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Flying Pen Press

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Flying Pen Press requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Pen Press

Thank you for the message on my talk page. I have left a further comment on the article's talk page about the reliability of the sources. I still don't see a compelling case made through reliable sources that shows why the article is notable. Both notability and verifiability are core policies of Wikipedia that have been in place, substantially unchanged, for many years. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 02:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your follow-up messages. I think you'll find I've added reliable sources.

As for the policies being substantially unchanged for many years, I'll button my lips before I go into my "I was editing wikis before Wikipedia even existed. Let me tell you about the good old days" rant. :-) Alden Loveshade (talk) 03:22, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flying Pen Press

The article Flying Pen Press has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A minor book publisher which may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. There is one source which appears to meet Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources, but at least one further source should be provided to demonstrate notability. See the article's talk page for further discussion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 03:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. My comments are at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Flying_Pen_Press#Contested_deletion Alden Loveshade (talk) 19:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anaphora Literary Press

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anaphora Literary Press requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Night of the Big Wind _talk 22:46, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

I deleted this one, not primarily for lack of a claim to importance, but because of the promotionalism--listing every possible connection important or unimportant. You can try again, but I suggest you wait for the decision on Flying Pen Press first, for much the same issues are relevant. If it is kept, ask me to restore this & I will do so. DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you let me know what I could do. I have asked an admin who can move the article to my user space to do so--although if you can do it that would be great. Once I have that if you could give me suggestions on how I can take care of any problems I would really appreciate it. Alden Loveshade (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Now at User:Alden Loveshade/Anaphora Literary Press. when it's ready for me to look at, let me know on my talk page. DGG ( talk ) 18:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will look over your notes and see what I can do to take care of any problems. Alden Loveshade (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Administrator:

I was delighted to read the listing for my Anaphora Literary Press and I'm very disappointed that it was deleted. I read through the listing and it had numerous citations from articles and magazines where my press and my Pennsylvania Literary Journal were sited. The listing was not an advertisement. If it was - every listing for a business on Wikipedia would be an advertisement. It stated only the most essential information about the press. If you have specific advice about what Alden should delete from the listing, I'm sure he'd be happy to delete un-necessary content that sounds like an advertisement. But, please pull the listing back up - so that he doesn't have to start from scratch. I published over 20 books with Anaphora this year alone, and we've had numerous reviews at notable magazines like Midwest Literary Review and the Library Journal. I read through Wikipedia's "Notability" requirements, and we definetely fit this definition. I can give specific quotes from the policy, if you need additional proof that the state of the website when you deleted it complied fully with Wikipedia requirements. Thank you in advance for your help with resolving this matter.

Cordially,

Anna Faktorovich, PhD, Director Anaphora Literary Press English Lecturer, Middle Georgia College pennsylvaniajournal@gmail.com (814) 273-0004 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.116.244.239 (talk) 20:34, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, I notified Anaphora Literary Press of the article after I began it. I generally do so when I write articles for wikis (or anything else, for that matter) and have done so since before Wikipedia even existed (anyone remember the original H2G2?). While I appreciate Anna Faktorovich's concerns, the administrator DGG has kindly sent the article to my user space where I can work to fix the problems. DGG has also agreed to review it for me to see if it's been fixed and is suitable for Wikipedia. If it is, the admin will advise me to put it back; if not, the admin will advise me not to. Wikipedia policies can sometimes be difficult, but if they didn't work Wikipedia wouldn't be the fifth most visted site on the Internet. Alden Loveshade (talk) 18:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

as nobody is working on it, I've removed it. If you do want it again, let me know. DGG ( talk ) 04:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but will take a few days--I'm having computer access problems. DGG ( talk ) 00:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I appreciate it. Alden Loveshade (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try, but I'm still using a borrowed internet connection. After 13 calls to them --I've kept a log--it is now 4 pages long--, Verizon finally restored the phone service this afternoon, but not yet the internet. DGG ( talk ) 05:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your response is here. Alden Loveshade (talk) 05:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flying Pen Press for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flying Pen Press is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Pen Press until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:21, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]